Spoiler:  The first and last paragraphs of this post are admittedly fake news.  Everything else is 100 percent true.

Atlanta, GA, January 30, 2017–The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports signs of a new and potential dangerous pandemic originating in Washington, DC.  The affliction was introduced to the Nation’s capital recently by a New York real estate mogul and reality show host who established residence in the federal district earlier this year.  Symptoms include rampant narcissism and pathological lying.  CDC warns the malady is highly contagious as evidenced by the number of individuals, who having come in contact with the initial carrier, now exhibit similar behavior.  CDC sites the following examples as the basis for their findings.

The extent to which this syndrome, dubbed DJT (Duh Jive Truth), can be transmitted without physical contact was demonstrated last Friday by Donald Trump’s underling Mike Pence, who is seldom if ever seen in proximity to his keeper.  At the March for Life rally in Washington, D.C., Pence praised Trump for ensuring federal funds would never be used to cover abortions.  Sound familiar?  Maybe because this prohibition has been in effect since passage of the Hyde Amendment in 1976.  But that would never stop the narcissus-in-chief and his second-in-command from taking credit for it.

Speaking of narcissists, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, during an interview Sunday on Fox News, made the ban on Muslims all about herself.

I was stopped many time — weren’t you? — after 9/11. I didn’t resemble or share a name with or be part of any kind of terrorist conspiracy, but this is what we do to keep a nation safe. (Fox News Sunday, January 29, 2017)

Kellyanne, you were not STOPPED.  Like every other person who boards an airplane these days, you were screened and waved on to your gate.  Were you ever separated from the rest of your traveling party?  Were you ever physically detained in a holding area?  Did you ever miss your flight?  People living with DJT, like Conway, often experience reverse psychological projection.  Instead of seeing their own behavior in others, they adopt the legitimate fears and apprehension of others as their own in hopes of garnering sympathy.  Do not be surprised if Conway next claims she was stopped and beaten by the police after being pulled over for a broken tail light.

But if you really want to know how debilitating DJT can be, look no further than poster boy Sean Spicer.  The White House press secretary has been criticized for carrying Trump’s water on a number of false claims.  Pundits have wondered how anyone could ask his chief spokesperson to do that.  CDC suggests Trump is not responsible. Once infected with DJT, Spicer is acting on his own when he informs the press and American citizens Trump had the largest inaugural audience EVER, the boss only lost the popular vote because of zombies and imaginary Latin Americans, and a Muslim ban is not a Muslim ban.  One CDC official used a Seinfeld episode to explain how DJT affects its victims.  Prior to taking a lie detector test, George Constanza (Jason Alexander) counsels his friend, “Jerry, just remember, it’s not a lie if you believe it.”

CDC, as yet, has not developed an antidote for DJT.  In the interim, CDC suggests the major preventative currently available is a free and aggressive press.  As one CDC researcher recommended, “Take two First Amendments and call us in the morning.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

He is Frank Underwood.

Once again, we should be paying attention to the lessons of history.  As the oft-quoted saying goes, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”  The best example which proves the case is the Marshall Plan. After the fall of the Axis powers, Allied governments understood humiliation of the defeated would only result in the rise of new demagogues rallying their countrymen under a banner of nationalism.  While no one would argue Adolph Hitler or Nazism was a good response to what ailed post-World War I Germany, historians recognize conditions in the Rhineland, including the imposition of wartime reparations, hyper-inflation and high unemployment, were a perfect storm which contributed to the rise of an authoritarian ruler.  In 1932, German voters, who legitimately feared for their economic and social well-being, made a bad but somewhat logical choice supporting the Nazi party, leading to Hitler’s appointment as chancellor.

Here’s what makes little sense to me. If the United States was going to have a similar swing towards authoritarianism, one would have expected it to come eight years ago.  In 2008, world financial markets were facing collapse, the value of personal assets (pensions, homes and stock portfolios) were tanking and unemployment was approaching double-digits.  Yet, voters elected a candidate who offered hope, not draconian measures to counter despair.  At the end of eight years in office, President Obama left his successor with a much healthier economy and less foreign military engagement than he inherited. Unemployment is now 4.7 percent, the Dow stands three times higher than it did in January 2009 and housing values have rebounded in most of the country.  American service men and women are not daily casualties.  There has been no equivalent to 9/11.

Which brings us to Donald Trump and Frank Underwood.  In the final episode of Season 4 of House of Cards, Underwood appears to be a presidential candidate headed for defeat.  Then Frank and his wife/running mate Claire join in a game of chicken with the leader of ICO (the fictional equivalent of ISIS) resulting in the violent death of an American hostage.  Underwood’s response, “We do not submit to terror. We make the terror.”  Such a statement might be viewed as a warning to ICO.  However, one suspects Underwood hopes the electorate will be as rattled as the ICO caliphate.

Similarly, in Trump’s alternate world, if conditions do not justify support for authoritarian rule, change the conditions.  Manufactured chaos is the order of the day.  Consider the following analysis by Mother Jones reporter Kevin Drum in which he questions whether there is a method in what looked like an amateurish roll-out of the immigration ban.

In cases like this, the smart money is usually on incompetence, not malice. But this looks more like deliberate malice to me. (Trump advisor Steve) Bannon wanted turmoil and condemnation. He wanted this executive order to get as much publicity as possible. He wanted the ACLU involved. He thinks this will be a PR win…Bannon thinks middle America will be appalled that lefties and the elite media are taking the side of terrorists.

A word to the wise.  If you are in a Washington Metro station and you see Steve Bannon, don’t stand too close to the edge of the platform.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

One of the challenges of writing a blog, particularly one which focuses on politics, is finding fresh perspectives on under-reported events.  The last thing you want to do is be part of an echo chamber.  For that reason, I have tried to avoid piling on where other reporters and pundits have done a sufficient job of making a case against the current occupant in the White House.

However, there is always a breaking point.  So rather than trying to be original, my goal in this post is to start connecting the dots between what Donald Trump says and the way different pundits are addressing his comments.  The particular event which triggered this post was Trump’s use of an example to fortify his claim (though widely discredited) he would have won the popular vote if not for 3-5 million illegal votes cast for Hillary Clinton.  Ironically, the first person charged with voter fraud during the 2016 election was Terri Lynn Rote, a 55 year-old Trump supporter from Des Moines, Iowa.

During a Monday White House reception for the bi-partisan leadership of Congress, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer asked what evidence Trump had to justify the claim of massive voter fraud.  According to several attendees, Trump used the example of professional golfer Bernard Langer, who he said is a friend and had told him about his voting experience in Florida on election day.  According to Trump, Langer was not allowed to vote while watching others who did not appear to be eligible voters (Trump suggested they were likely from Latin American countries) were allowed to cast provisional ballots.

Langer’s daughter Christina responded to Trump’s claim as follows:

He is a citizen of Germany. He is not a friend of President Trump’s, and I don’t know why he would talk about him.

In other words, within a single, short narrative, Trump again chose “alternative facts” over reality.  To paraphrase Elizabeth Barrett Browning, “How much do I lie to thee, let me count the ways?”

1. Langer is in the United States on a permanent residence status and is therefore barred from voting.
2. Therefore, Langer had no reason to be in a line on election day.
3. Therefore, he would not be in a position to judge who else in line might be an ineligible voter.
4. Therefore, he was not blocked from voting.
5. Although Langer has played golf with Trump, he is neither a friend nor supporter.

Five lies in a single anecdote.  Possibly a new Trump record.  What the Lyin’ King didn’t realize is his anecdote, if actually true, makes the opposite case.  A non-citizen was blocked from voting.  And questionable voters had to go through the provisional ballot process.  The voting integrity process works exactly as it is designed to do.

I thought about calling this post, “The Man-Child Who Cried Wolf,” but Bob Cesca, managing editor of The Daily Banter, beat me to it.  Yesterday, on the Stephanie Miller radio show, he explained why lying about the little things will have serious future implications.  Cesca expects there will be a real crisis when Trump needs Americans to believe him about the perceived threat and his chosen response.  The longer and more consistently Trump and his minions present lies as reality, the less likely he will be able to rally Americans behind any course of action regardless how legitimate it might be.

Which brings me to Keith Olberman.  After observing the first few days of the new administration, he believes Trump represents a clear and present danger to the future of the United States and the planet.  In commentary for Gentleman’s Quarterly he warns any attempt to oust Trump from office must not be seen as a liberal, Democratic plot.  Rational conservatives and Republicans must be part of the group that walks into the oval office and says, “Enough is enough.”

But how does one make that happen? Olberman suggests we forego disagreements about policy in the short term.  Instead, based on Trump’s behavior since the inauguration, we approach Trump supporters and only ask one question.  “Can you look me straight in the eyes and honestly say there is not something seriously wrong with this man?”  Olberman admits that a small segment of Trump supporters are as unstable as their leader and will never join the movement.

But we do not need everyone.  Sometimes one is enough.  Remember, it was Barry Goldwater who told Richard Nixon he needed to resign.  Surely, there is at least one more Barry Goldwater among the Republican faithful.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP