Monthly Archives: March 2018

I Have the Best…

 

One of the most infamous politically incorrect jokes of all time, more so in the light of the #metoo and #timesup movement, is the late Sam Kinison’s reflection on domestic violence.  “I don’t condone wife beating, but I understand it.”  I think of Kinison often, especially when I catch myself making a similar observation about some aspect of human behavior when I recognize there is anecdotal evidence supporting an otherwise unjustifiable stereotype.

This week was no exception.  So let me get this off my chest.  I DON’T CONDONE ANTI-SEMITISM, BUT I UNDERSTAND IT.  For me to make such a statement is a clear conflict of interest, having been born a Jew, and one who still considers himself a “member of the tribe” despite skepticism about the presence of a divine being.  Spirituality comes in many forms.

And do not put me in the same category as the self-hating Jews in pre-Hitler German chronicled in Der jüdische Selbsthaß by German-Jewish philospher Theodor Lessing (1872-1933).  I do not hate Jews.  What I do abhor are Jewish individuals whose actions provide fodder to the ignorant and prejudiced who seek affirmation of their bigotry.

This week, the Trump administration delivered a trifecta.  It began with Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant Michael Cohen.  Cohen is the “fixer,” who makes each of Trump’s illegal or immoral actions, whether personal, business or political, disappear.  He puts his loyalty to Trump above his oath before the bar “to support the constitution of the United Sates, and the State of New York, and will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney, according to the best of my ability.”  Whether enabling Trump’s dishonesty, negotiating questionable business deals on his benefactor’s behalf or paying hush money to cover up Trump’s character flaws, Cohen re-defines the term “shyster.”

Second spot in the trifecta is reserved for Sam Nunberg, whose 15 minutes of fame spread across every cable news network Tuesday night, making him the talk of Washington.  He is now the poster boy for anti-Semites who believe Jews have no loyalty to anyone but themselves.  After years of seeking to be part of Trump’s inner circle, Nunberg jumped ship when he was included in a broad subpoena of documents and emails by special counsel Robert Mueller.  Nunberg epitomizes the Talmud’s description of a weasel.  “The weasel lives on dung-heaps and in holes and chinks of walls.  It kills animals larger than itself and even attacks corpses.”

But the coup de grace came when national economic advisor Gary Cohn resigned on Tuesday following Trump’s unexpected announcement he would impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.  I know the following statement is not news and has been reported on every broadcast outlet and in every print newspaper since the announcement of Cohn’s pending departure late yesterday afternoon. But it is worth repeating again and again.  THIS IS THE SAME GARY COHN WHO DID NOT TAKE A STAND WHEN TRUMP DECLARED TIKI-TORCH CARRYING NEO-NAZIS AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS INCLUDED “SOME VERY FINE PEOPLE.”  Cohn stood next to Trump that day and stood next to him during the debate over the tax cut which will prove to be a financial godsend for Cohn and his Goldman Sachs colleagues.  Only when Trump threatened actions which might hurt Cohn’s personal bottom line did he break ranks.  Gary Cohn IS the modern day equivalent of Shylock, the Jewish moneylender and  the principal antagonist in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice.  Except in Cohn’s case, he chose to convert to Trumpism, instead of Christianity.

Let me be clear, my disgust of these three individuals arises from disbelief that thinking adults who were raised in the Jewish tradition of “Tikkun Olam,” which translates to “repair the world,” were so willing to forsake their heritage in search of some gold ring in the service of a man who prefers chaos and discord to harmony and order. But my greater fear is that Trump supporters will now view these men as traitors to the cause.  In case you have not been paying attention, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recently reported there was a 59 percent increase in anti-Semitic incidents in 2017 over the previous year.  As if those with an already existing anti-Jewish disposition needed another excuse to justify actions which have included bomb threats, desecration of cemetaries, harassment of school children and neo-Nazi rallies and marches.

If, on September 15, 2016, before the Economic Club of New York, when Trump said, “I’ll choose the best people for my administration,” he meant the best people to affirm the stereotypical prejudices of anti-Semites, it’s hard to disagree.

[NOTE:  I know.  You may be asking why I did not include Jared Kushner in this post.  He certainly had an equally bad week.  Two reasons.  First, Ivanka chose him originally.  Daddy is just trying to keep her in his good graces.  Second, and more importantly, there seems to be no line he will not cross in order to protect his father-in-law or his business interests.  Stay tuned.  That too may change when Jared’s second term is 15-20 years in the Big House instead of the White House.]

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

STEELing an Election

Breaking News, Saturday Morning, March 3, 2018:

  • Canada “flabbergasted’ by Trump’s tariff  proposal (Washington Post)
  • Trump’s Tariffs Stoke Fears That Trade War Will “Kill” U.S. Jobs (New York Times)
  • Trump risks more than a trade war by targeting China (CNN.com)
  • EU Threatens Iconic U.S. Brands After Trump Opens Door to Trade War (Bloomberg.com)

Stick with me on this one folks.  The logical path for this argument is non-linear.  The reason I share these headlines is to show the true danger of actual FAKE NEWS is when the supposed legitimate press responds to it.

Raise your hand if you really think Donald J. Trump is ever going to impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum.  I know.  You saw him say it last Thursday  during a televised Trump infomercial with a roomful of industry executives.  Remember!  This is the same Donald Trump who said ON TV he would sign a clean DACA bill.  This is the same Donald Trump who told a bi-partisan group of legislators ON TV he thought Dianne Feinstein’s assault weapons ban should be included in a comprehensive gun safety proposal and the government need not worry about due process before confiscating the guns of those who were a potential danger to themselves and others.  That is, until he had an UNTELEVISED dinner with NRA representatives the same evening.  (Too bad none of the White House press corps asked the white-liar-in chief Sarah Huckabee Sanders why THAT “listening session” was held behind closed doors.)

Yes, the tariff ANNOUNCEMENT was REAL, but I am willing to bet the farm (which by the way will be worth much less if there ARE tariffs and all the importers of U.S. grown grain retaliate) the IMPOSITION of tariffs is FAKE.  How do I know this?  Because this morning I Googled the major news outlets in Pittsburgh, PA and Wheeling, WV to see if they shared the national media’s concern about the consequences of a tariff-induced trade war.  The front pages of the newspapers and web-sites were devoid of any news or commentary about the potential negative impacts of proposed tariffs.

WhImage result for pennsylvania 18th congressional districty, you ask, did I choose these two markets?  Because they are in the closest vicinity to Pennsylvania’s 18th Congressional District which as you are probably aware is holding a special election on March 13 to fill the seat vacated by Tim Murphy.  “Retired” congressman Murphy is one in a growing parade of fallen evangelical, family values Republicans who resigned when it was reported this pro-life zealot urged a woman with whom he had an extra-marital affair to get an abortion.  Instead of referring to Representatives as being members of the “lower chamber” maybe it’s time we call that wing of the U.S. Capitol the “Glass House.”

A few facts about the PA 18th.  Some have been widely reported such as the fact Trump carried the district by 19 points in 2016.  And, despite the injection of millions of dollars to bolster the campaign of Republican Rick Saccone, the most recent polls suggest the contest is within the margin of error.  Fortunately, trying to label his opponent Connor Lamb as a Pelosi Democrat and misrepresenting Lamb’s position on policy issues (Lamb is decidedly more conservative than your garden variety Democrat) has fallen on deaf ears.  To date, none of these tactics have reversed the closeness of the contest.

But wait, there is one thing on which the press has not focused with one major exception, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.  In a Friday article titled, “Trump tariff may also protect GOP from competition in southwestern Pennsylvania,” Chris Potter writes:

Metals manufacturing has deep economic and historical ties in southwestern Pennsylvania, including swaths of the 18th District itself. The AFL-CIO estimates that the district contains some 17,000 voters who are either steelworkers or related to them. Unions are key to Democratic hopes of winning an upset in the district, which backed Mr. Trump by roughly 20 percent in 2016.

Potter goes on to explain why unions may make the difference in the balloting and Saccone’s potential problem with this scenario.

As a state legislator, Mr. Saccone has often been at odds with organized labor on issues like paying a “prevailing wage” on infrastructure projects, and union leaders, at least, are bent on defeating him.

If you doubt the political influence of steelworkers in the Keystone State, just listened to Democratic Senator Bob Casey.  “I commend the president for announcing his intent to take action to protect our steelworkers from countries, like China, that cheat on trade.”

So how do you ameliorate Saccone’s anti-union history.  Not surprisingly, Trump has scheduled a trip to southwestern Pennsylvania prior to the election.  You can already hear his spiel.  “I alone am standing up for you.  Obama did nothing.  You saw me on TV.  You saw me take on China when no one else would.  All of my advisors told me not to do this.  They care about their port folios.  I care about the threatened steelworkers here in Pennsylvania.  And so does Rick Saccone.”

Forget some economists say a trade war with the attendant increase in goods and services would entirely wipe out the consumer buying power promised under the 2017 tax cut legislation.  Forget the 400+ point drop in the Dow Index following the tariff announcement which translated into a half trillion dollar decrease in wealth in four hours.  Forget the lost jobs which would result from a global trade war.  Forget, American protectionism will drive our traditional trading partners to seek new alliances with countries like China or even Russia.  But, as I’ve suggested, these worse case scenarios will not happen.  After March 13th, Trump will announce the threat of tariffs brought the world in line (just like he claims the threat of imposing Congressional sanctions for election meddling has deterred future Russian interference).  Trump will take his ball and go home.  And the media will once again be looking around and wondering what just happened.

So what is the best case scenario?  More and more 2016 voters realize their 21st-century Huey Long is willing to risk their jobs and savings to avoid personal embarrassment if the Pennsylvania 18th District flips from red to blue.  It will be interesting to see if the same voters who forgive Trump on character issues “because I’m doing better economically” have a change of heart when the latter is no longer true.

Image result for arpegeIn an iconic 1996 Madison Avenue advertising campaign, a major cosmetics company flooded the airwaves and magazines with the following, “Promise her anything but give her Arpège!”  Mr. Fifth Avenue is hoping the same sales pitch works a week from Tuesday.  “Promise them anything…”  But there is no Arpège.  When they realize they were stiffed, it will be too late.  Oh, they’ll smell the aroma, but it won’t be perfume.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Law-Free Zones

 

Image result for congressman john rutherfordYesterday, my congressman John Rutherford (R-Jacksonville, FL) attended Donald Trump’s bi-partisan roundtable on stemming gun violence in the United States.  The following is a transcript of his dialogue with Trump.

Rutherford: Know this, and you (Trump) said it, all of that (referring to other measures such as background checks) can break down and someone can go into a gun free zone and just kill at will.  Defenseless people.

Trump: You’re defenseless.

Rutherford:  So, number one for security from a law enforcement perspective, the only thing, and it sounds cliché, because it’s true.  The only thing that stops a bad gun with a gun is a good guy with a gun.  So you have to have those officers or some armed security at our schools.  The issue is, and we talk about, those are areas where there are no guns.  The reason I carry a concealed firearm everywhere (my emphasis) I go is because I don’t know where those gun-free zones are that I may be walking through at the mall or at the donut shop or wherever I might be.  So that’s why I carry a concealed; so I can protect myself, I can protect my family who might be with all of those around me.

Trump:  You’re not allowed to carry a concealed in a gun-free zone.  So what do you do?

Rutherford:  You can’t carry in those areas.

Trump:  They are the most dangerous places.  Gun-free zones.  It’s true.

Rutherford:  So that’s why I think we need to go back to the concealed carry issue and national reciprocity.

Huh?  Did a congressman who served 12 years as chief of the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office just confess to carrying a concealed weapon into places prohibited by law?  And did Trump, of all people, remind him that might be breaking the law?  Welcome to the “upside down.”

His excuse?  “I don’t know where those gun-free zones are.”  I do.  And so does anyone else who has bothered to read Section 790.06 (12) (a) of the Florida State Statues.

A license issued under this section (referring to concealed carry licenses) does not authorize any person to openly carry a handgun or carry a concealed weapon or firearm into:

1. Any place of nuisance as defined in s. 823.05;

2. Any police, sheriff, or highway patrol station;

3. Any detention facility, prison, or jail;

4. Any courthouse;

5. Any courtroom, except that nothing in this section would preclude a judge from carrying a concealed weapon or determining who will carry a concealed weapon in his or her courtroom;

6. Any polling place;

7. Any meeting of the governing body of a county, public school district, municipality, or special district;

8. Any meeting of the Legislature or a committee thereof;

9. Any school, college, or professional athletic event not related to firearms;

10. Any elementary or secondary school facility or administration building;

11. Any career center;

12. Any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises, which portion of the establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose;

13. Any college or university facility unless the licensee is a registered student, employee, or faculty member of such college or university and the weapon is a stun gun or nonlethal electric weapon or device designed solely for defensive purposes and the weapon does not fire a dart or projectile;

14. The inside of the passenger terminal and sterile area of any airport, provided that no person shall be prohibited from carrying any legal firearm into the terminal, which firearm is encased for shipment for purposes of checking such firearm as baggage to be lawfully transported on any aircraft; or

15. Any place where the carrying of firearms is prohibited by federal law.

Since you seem to have skipped this lesson in law enforcement training, I guess you also don’t realize you are guilty of a second degree misdemeanor  (Section 790.06 (12)(d)) which is punishable by up to six moths in jail and a fine of $500  (Sections 775.082 and 775.083 of the Florida State Statues).  I’m sure the Florida treasury would welcome your patronage.

One more question, Congressman.  By everywhere, does that include carrying a concealed weapon in the United States Capitol?  If so, here’s another law you may have overlooked.

In 1967, with civil rights and anti-Vietnam War demonstrations assuming an increasingly strident tone—including several disruptive protests from the House and Senate galleries—Congress passed a new measure stipulating, among other provisions, that it be made a criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in prison, to carry or discharge a firearm in the Capitol.  (Politico.com)

Strange.  I didn’t hear participants at the annual Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) conference chanting, “Lock him up.  Lock up him.”  Instead, in lock-step with the NRA, Rutherford is echoing those who want to arm teachers, calling for more guns, not less.  Congressman, before you start making new laws I suggest you try obeying the existing ones.  If you think gun-free zones are dangerous, just think what life would be like if everyone followed your example and created their own “law-free zones.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP