Category Archives: Culture

How Donald Trump Saved America

 

I have been wrong about a lot of things over the last five years.  I believed Donald Trump would eventually cross a line over which other elected Republican officials would not sacrifice their own futures.  WRONG!  I thought Democrats would maintain their huge majority in the House of Representatives and retake the Senate with at least 52 Democratic seats this year.  WRONG!

However, on one thing I was right.  Every time someone told me they were worried voter suppression would result in a second Trump term, I replied, “People will walk through fire to vote this year.  If nothing else, 2016 proved elections matter.”  And vote they did, for both candidates.  2020 was just one more example of the adage, “People do not realize how precious something is until it is taken away.”  In this case, they only needed someone to try and take it away.

And without meaning to, the first president of the United States who openly advocated a coup d’etat saved American democracy by intervening in the natural order of things.  As mentioned in previous blog entries, the United States is living on borrowed time according to Alexis de Tocqueville, who, based on history, theorized the average life of a great civilization was 200 years.  Pushing 244 years since declaring its independence, America is playing with house money.

But closer examination suggests de Tocqueville’s prediction, though delayed, was still highly probable, if not already underway.  The fact our national downfall was happening at a slower than average pace also meant it was more incremental and not as apparent.  America had become the proverbial frog in a kettle of water rising in temperature little by little, not realizing it would soon die having boiled to death.

Alexander Fraser Tyler, Cycle Of Democracy (1770) | CITIZENS MAGAZINEScottish philosopher Alexander Fraser Tyler developed the paradigm by which the destructive heat which dooms civilizations rises incrementally over time.  His description of the rise and fall of geopolitical societies consists of the following eight stages.

From bondage to spiritual growth.
From spiritual growth to great courage.
From great courage to liberty.
From liberty to abundance.
From abundance to complacency.
From complacency to apathy.
From apathy to dependence.
From dependence back to bondage.

By no means is the time period between each stage to the next equal in length.  In the case of the United States, one can argue the first four stages lasted three and a half centuries spanning from the arrival of the Mayflower to the post-World War II era, ending in the mid-1960s at the juncture of the Great Society and the Vietnam War.  The only argument I might have with Tyler is the description of stage five, substituting “arrogance” for “complacency.”  Was it not a feeling of infallibility which seeded missteps in international events such as Vietnam, 9/11 and the second Iraq war?

This period of complacency/arrogance quickly led to apathy, characterized by the decline in interest in government and politics most evident in the constant decrease in percentage of Americans who exercised their right to vote.  Until finally, in 2016, enough voters to carry the electoral college, turned to a candidate who claimed, “Only I can fix it.”  The very definition of dependency revolves around the notion of reliance on others who tell you to stand down.  They will handle everything for you.

Which brings me back to the title of this post.  Donald Trump, by turning up the temperate so high, so abruptly, alerted the frogs in the kettle to what was happening.  They recognized the danger they were in and committed to do whatever it required to change the all but certain outcome.  Trump may brag about the 74 million voters who cast ballots for him, but more importantly, he awakened more than 81 million American who declared, “America is not ready to give up on democracy.  Not on our watch.”

The only remaining question?  Having come so close to stage eight of the cycle, from dependence to bondage, has America been given a second chance to start over at stage one, advancing from near-bondage to spiritual growth? Based on the 2020 outcome, when Americans turned to a candidate who made the centerpiece of his campaign “a fight for the soul of the Nation,” a spiritual mantra even an agnostic can believe in, perhaps there is a chance.  And for that, we owe Donald Trump.  Without him, politics in America over the last five years would have been business as usual, most likely in an incrementally advancing direction which, in time, would have proved the validity of both de Tocqueville’s and Tyler’s predictions about the path the United States otherwise might have taken.

The media keep referring to America as more divided than any time since the War Between the States.  To continue the analogy, the structure on the West Capitol steps will become the modern equivalent of Appomattox on January 20th.  And the Biden administration will be responsible for the next Reconstruction.  To avoid the mistakes and lingering animosity of bringing a nation back together for the second time will take spiritual growth and courage by both sides.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Stupid Is…

A plague o’ both your houses!

~Mercutio/Romeo & Juliet/Act III, Scene 1

Like the coronavirus pandemic, stupidity does not care whether you are a Democrat or a Republican.  This sad fact of life was never more evident based on the actions this week by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Let’s start with Governor Cuomo, who on Wednesday signed a bill into law banning the sale or display of Confederal battle flags on state property despite the fact the legislation may violate First Amendment protection of free speech and expression.  Cuomo acknowledged this saying, “…certain technical changes are necessary to balance the State’s interests in preventing the use of hate symbols on state land with free speech protections…”  For the record, the bill also applied to other “symbols of hate” such as swastikas.

The Great Bits: Roy Wood Jr.'s 'Black Patriotism?'I suspect one person who might file an amicus brief when the constitutionality of the ban comes before a judge will be Roy Wood, Jr.  Some of you may recognize Wood as “the senior black correspondent” on “The Daily with Trevor Noah.”  However, his rationale against banning the Confederate flag was first voiced during his “Father Figure” comedy special on Comedy Central during which his opening after taking the stage before a largely African-American audience was:

But if we get rid of the Confederate flag…

Then, following nervous laughter and a few gasps from those in attendance, he explained:

How am I going to know who the dangerous white people are? I’m just saying, the flag had a couple upsides. Let’s just be real about it. I ain’t saying keep it around, but I grew up in the South. I can’t tell you how many times the Confederate flag came in handy. Stopping for gas at a strange place at 2 in the morning, you see that flag hanging from the window, you know this is not the place to get gas…

Makes sense.  Which would you prefer?  That white supremacists and anti-Semites travel among us unidentified?  Or that they proudly wear their bigotry on their sleeve so we can just as proudly avoid them?  One can only hope this new form of “concealed carry” does not become a movement in which red states start issuing licenses by which citizens can pack miniature Confederate flags.  Or that Wayne LaPierre does not declare, “The only way to stop a bad guy with a ‘black lives matter’ banner is a good old guy with a Confederate flag.”

Pin on CaricaturesWhich brings me to Mitch McConnell.  You remember Mitch, the guy who spent hundreds of millions of dollars during the 2020 campaign backing “law and order” Senate candidates, warning Americans that calls to “defund the police” would lead to lawlessness and chaos in the streets.  Well, Mitch was right.  However, what he did not tell you is that he would be the one to “defund the police.”

Despite bi-partisan pleas from governors and mayors that lost revenues, a result of the economic impact of the pandemic, would force layoffs of  essential first responders including firefighters and police, the Republican Senate continues to exclude any public sector support in the next COVID-19 relief package.  As recently as December 10, the majority leader criticized what he calls “controversial state bailouts,” but continues to push for blanket employer liability protection.  Once again, to paraphrase Barry Goldwater, a not-so-free-market “corporate bailout” in defense of capitalism is no vice.

In July, a Brookings Institute study reported state and local governments had already laid off more than 1.5 million workers including teachers, firefighters and police.  The report goes on to predict “deep budget and job cuts in state and local government will likely grow in the next few months and fester for years to come.”

President-elect Joe Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have all distanced themselves from the “defund the police” movement.  Miser Mitch, maybe it’s time you do the same.

It just goes to prove, stupid is as stupid does, no matter which side of the aisle you sit on.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

A Temporary Democracy

 

In defense of her decision to move forward with impeachment last December, House Speaker quoted Benjamin Franklin who replied to an inquiry about the nature of government laid out in the newly adopted Constitution,  “A republic, if we can keep it.”  On a day when the electoral college will affirm the selection of Joe Biden as the next president of the United States, I think there is an even more appropriate message from a less well known figure.

Eisenhower Executive Office Building : washingtondcThe year was 1991.  Among my responsibilities as a policy director at the National Governors Association was helping states implement the Americans with Disabilities Act which passed the previous year.  In that role, I was often invited to meetings of the National Council on Disabilities, established by President George H. W. Bush.  My introduction to the group was a session in the Treaty Room in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (then known simply as the Old Executive Office Building).  The chairwoman was the1982 Ms. Wheelchair America  from Maryland Marian Schooling-Vessels.

The topic that day was accelerating compliance, especially accessibility.  There was general agreement among the Council members this was among the thornier issues because it involved money, the cost of adding ramps, elevators and, in some cases, total reconstruction of public facilities to accommodate those who could not maneuver in narrow corridors or around sharp corners.  While the 1990 act included fines for non-compliance, the Council felt persuasion was a better path to follow.  Get public officials to make the necessary changes, not because they had to, but because it was the right thing to do.

But how?  What was the message?  It was then Ms. Schooling-Vessels presented an argument which has stuck with me for 30 years which I can only paraphrase here.

MWA Titleholders | Ms. Wheelchair AmericaIn the past, we have asked people, “Imagine you were disabled.  Put yourself in our shoes.”  But the truth is they WILL be in our shoes.  They look at us and see a disabled person.  We need to remind them we look at them and see a “temporarily abled” person.

On this day, when the electors cast their votes for the next president we must remember America has been and always will be a “temporary democracy.”  The time has come for Americans to stop referring to autocracies  as though they were politically and morally disabled.  Or that they are entities we need to accommodate so that we can co-exist.  Instead, we need to prepare for a time when other democracies might look at the United States and say, “Who could imagine such a healthy republic would become so politically disabled?  How do we restructure alliances (as though they were non-accessible facilities) to accommodate this new reality?”

Some believe the last four years were that time and today’s electoral conclave is the beginning of political and moral rehabilitation.  But unlike the COVID-19 vaccine which is also in the news on this historic day, there is no permanent antidote for disability.  One can go from temporarily abled to disabled and back on multiple occasions over a lifetime.  The same is true for nations.

So the next time you hear a family member, friend or colleague suggest American democracy dodged a bullet in 2020, just add, “This time.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

A Post-Trump Confessional

First, he came after James Comey, and we said nothing.

Then, he called white supremacists and neo-Nazis fine people, and we said nothing.

Then, he called the press “the enemy of the people,” and we said nothing.

Then, he separated children from their parents, and we said nothing.

Then he accused George Soros of financing illegal immigrants and one of his followers murdered 11 congregants at the Tree of Life Synagogue, and we said nothing.

Then he called Hispanics “breeders” and one of his followers massacred 23 El Paso residents, and we said nothing.

The he called for the arrest and jailing of his political opponents, and we said nothing.

Then he accused Democrats of rigging the election, and we said nothing.

Then he came after us, and we spoke out and are being praised as heroes for standing up to him.

~Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Voting System Implementation Manager Gabriel Sterling

2020 election: Georgia official Gabriel Sterling calls out Donald Trump, sounds alarm about 'potential acts of violence' - ABC30 FresnoPlease spare me.  After all this you voted for him and said you would vote for him again.  I’m sorry, but heroes do not wait until they are the ones in personal danger.  They use their position, authority and everything at their disposal to safeguard those who are caught in the crossfire.  Yes, I know Sterling said he did not do it for himself, but for a 20 year old delivery man who was only doing his job.  But, if he and Raffensperger had spoken up immediately, maybe that young man would not have been put in such a dangerous situation in the first place.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

In the Personal Interest

 

Prologue

One of the assignments I gave students in my “Imagination and Entrepreneurship” class at Miami University was to establish a goal for each decade of their lives.  And each semester, I shared my goals during the in-class discussion.  In my 70s, I hoped to publish the great American political novel.

Last week I was searching through an old hard drive to respond to a request for information from a former college.  During that quest I also found the original outline of that story created in 2002, which tells you a lot about my tendency to procrastinate.  The manuscript is now 50 percent completed. And being nine years from turning 80, I am still within reach of fulfilling the goal.

The novel is titled, “In the National Interest.”  If is a fictional account of the Kennedy assassination which focuses not on what happened, but the why it happened.  When the plot is initially presented in the first pages, I fully expect the reader to think my thesis is totally implausible.  Using detailed public and sourced documentation, my goal is to get the reader, by the end, to say, “Maybe this is not as crazy as it first seemed.”  I do have a recurring dream in which, following publication, authorities come to our house to ask, “How did you figure it out?  Who told you this?”

In the Personal Interest

For me, the greatest mystery of the Trump era has been the extent to which so many voters appear to have acted contrary to their own self-interests.  Consider the following.

  • States with the unhealthiest populations cheer the rollback of air and water quality regulations.
  • The attorneys generals of those same states joined the administration’s law suit to nullify the Affordable Care Act.
  • Farm states continued to march lock-step into the red column despite trade policies resulting in a record number of small and family farm bankruptcies.
  • Many blue collar workers bought into Trump’s populist message while he and Mitch McConnell filled the federal court system with judges and justices who regularly rule in favor of big business over labor.
  • And finally, Americans without a college degree, flock to Trump rallies to be told he loves you just the way you are, although education has always been recognized as the gateway to the middle class and a higher standard of living.

Though irrational, the attraction of a Donald Trump is understandable.  Most of these voters are apprehensive about being left behind in a changing world.  And so they grasp for straws.  Trump told them what they wanted to hear.  That they were victims. And they swallowed it whole.

What is more surprising is the number of educated, well-off individuals and interests who also chose to act contrary to their own interests over the last four years.  Let me share just two examples.

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported General Motors “will no longer back the Trump administration in its legal battle to strip California’s authority to set its own fuel-efficiency regulations, saying GM’s goals for green cars are aligned with the state and the incoming Biden administration.”  WTF?  GM thinks its long-term profit potential lies in an all-electric automotive future, but joined the administration in a law suit contrary to their own corporate strategy and a $27 billion investment in cars not dependent on fossil fuels.  And simply because a majority of Americans voted for Joe Biden, they have changed their position.

Talk about a lack of conviction.  Biden has made it clear he will direct DOJ to drop the suit leaving the corporate partners to carry on without government backing.  If GM and others carmakers who are reassessing their position honestly believed the legal challenge was in their own interest there is no way they would surrender based on a change in the political winds.  GM is even touting Biden’s job creation numbers as evidenced in their letter announcing their termination of legal action against California.

Yet, the best example of people who have acted against their own personal interest in the Trump era is the namesake himself.  I know I have said this a million times already, but I will say it again.  “Good governance makes good politics.”  It was in Donald Trump’s own interest to grab the pandemic by the horns and demonstrate a level of competence which would have silenced much of the criticism of his management style.  Instead of touting record highs for the Dow Jones industrial average, just imagine if he could have come to the podium and said, “While America has 4.5 percent of the world’s population, we have taken actions and promoted policies which have resulted in the U.S. having a proportionately lower share of cases, hospitalizations and death than would have been expected.”

Imagine if Trump had invoked the Defense Production Act to ensure every hospital and nursing home had MORE than the supplies they needed to protect front-line workers in these facilities.  Instead of media stories about South Dakota nurses in tears talking about the conditions under which they have to operate, medical personnel would be praising the federal government for its exceedingly adequate response.  So, do not be surprised when, GM-like, dozens of American corporations line up to get behind the Biden administration plan for the production and distribution of PPE and vaccine delivery systems next year.

Which, as it always does, brings me back to cinema as art imitating life,  in this case, Aaron Sorkin’s script for The American President (1995).  The relevant message is embedded in an exchange between presidential advisor Lewis Rothschild (Michael J. Fox) and President Andrew Shepherd (Michael Douglas).

Lewis Rothschild:

People want leadership. And in the absence of genuine leadership, they will listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone. They want leadership, Mr. President. They’re so thirsty for it, they’ll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there’s no water, they’ll drink the sand.

President Shepherd:

Lewis, we’ve had Presidents who were beloved, who couldn’t find a coherent sentence with two hands and a flashlight. People don’t drink the sand, ’cause they’re thirsty, Lewis. They drink it ’cause they don’t know the difference.

Yesterday, GM affirmed they know the difference.  It is a safe guess Donald Trump never will nor cares to understand the difference, and that is why he was never able to expand his voter base enough to ensure re-election.  The challenge for Joe Biden when it comes to re-uniting America is whether, through competent and empathetic governance, he can get more and more people to see that difference.  Only then will they be open to the possibility their own self-interests lie somewhere other than following Donald Trump to an imaginary oasis.

Epilogue

When I first began to draft “In the National Interest,” I was concerned that I still did not have a satisfying conclusion to the story.  That bothered me until I attended a lecture by the author of John Adams David McCullough.  During the question and answer session, a student asked McCullough whether he ever started a book before he knew how it would end.  I was pleasantly surprised when the writer said that was always the case.  He went on to explain there is always an illuminating moment during the process when the ending becomes apparent.  As with most creative moments, it cannot be forced.  If patient, it will come to you.

I had the same experience just a few months ago.  I had just sat down at the computer intent on capturing an idea about how the narrator in my novel would react to his latest discovery, a critical document that might be the “Rosetta Stone” which unlocked the truth about the assassination.  And there it was.  I stopped what I was working on, and by the end of the day, had drafted the final chapter in total.  Now, confident in the ending, I am left with the hard work of getting there.

Which brings me back to this counter-intuitive narrative of whether individuals will pay more attention to their personal interests than tribal loyalties.  I have no idea how this saga will end.  But I can assure you, sometime in the next four years, there will be a moment or event when the outcome is revealed.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP