Category Archives: Culture

#600

DEPROGRAMMING 101 is one person’s attempt to encourage others to open their minds and challenge the status quo. I do not pretend I have all the answers nor do I want you to take my positions as gospel. The blogs on each topic are presented as food for thought and stimuli. Each ends with the tagline, “For what it’s worth,” which in some cases may be zero. The ultimate goal is not to find RIGHT answers, it is to promote the asking of BETTER questions.

Dr. ESP/October 28, 2015

John W. Gardner - WikipediaGo into any bookstore.  There are shelves upon shelves of volumes in the “Self Help” section encouraging individuals to “reinvent themselves.”  My personal favorite is Self-Renewal by John W. Gardner, founder of Common Cause and former secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Lyndon Johnson.  The main thesis centers on the impact of change on individuals and societies.  Gardner observes, throughout history, failure to recognize and respond to natural and man-made metamorphoses has led to the decline and fall of great civilizations, but such outcomes are not inevitable.

However, there is an alternative route to survival in difficult times.  I became aware of this option as the result of a marketing exercise I began in 2012 to find potential clients for The ImagineIt Project, a company I joined in 2005 and took over as CEO in 2011.  I Googled the term “reinvent” in corporate annual reports and in CEO presentations to stockholders.  While this research identified several potential targets, the source documents contained another equally intriguing phrase.  “We need to go back to our entrepreneurial roots.”  In other words, what did we do at the outset which made us successful?  And where might we have gone astray?

Which is why I began this post with the first words I ever wrote about the philosophy and mission associated with this endeavor.  But more importantly, I wanted to assess whether I had violated them, spending more time trying to explain what was happening rather than looking for “better questions” which would encourage others to join in the search for new knowledge and enlightenment.  Therefore, on the the occasion of this milestone, post #600, I decided to circle back to the roots of Deprogramming101 and present a series of questions which deserve more thought and new perspectives.

  1. Why do politicians and the people who vote for them have such short memories?  Example : In a monologue about mascots, comedian Costaki Economopoulos (real name) reminds us, “The Republicans have the elephant, who never forgets.  But Republicans can’t seem to remember what a bad idea supply side economics is.”
  2. Why do Catholics who represent 22 percent of the U.S. population currently hold five out of nine seats on the Supreme Court, soon to be six?  One would think white Evangelicals, who are the most loyal Republican voters beginning with Ronald Reagan, might ask, “When are you going to appoint one of us?”
  3. If the 1962 Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr affirmed the concept of one-person-one-vote, why shouldn’t that apply to the election of the president?  Prior to the decision, states could apportion seats in their legislature’s upper chamber based on geo-political boundaries (i.e. counties) which gave undue power to voters in rural, less populated jurisdictions.  You know, the equivalent of Wyoming having one electoral vote per 195,000 residents while Florida has one electoral vote per 741,000 residents.
  4. Why is there still no available ala carte cable or streaming television service?  A related question:  Why don’t the major broadcast networks and their affiliates stream programming for free since their main source of revenue, advertising fees, increases based on the number of viewers?
  5. What if black lung disease prevents COVID-19 related fatalities?  West Virginia ranks 44th among the states and Washington, D.C. in number of COVID-19 deaths (Reuters) although residents have the highest rates of obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure in the United States (AP News/December 18, 2018).
  6. Why was only one American (Kareem Serageldin) sentenced to prison for his role in the 2008 financial crisis?  According to the Financial Times, 47 bank employees and directors worldwide received jail terms, led by Iceland with 25 convictions.  Serageldin was sentenced in 2013 to a term of two years and six months. In 2011, Oklahoman Patricia Spottedcrow was sentenced to 12 years in prison for selling $31 worth of cannabis (Source: Tulsa World).  Justice may be blind, but she has not lost her sense of smell.
  7. Why does a single Ace pocket comb at Walmart cost $2.22 and the 2-pack costs $6.98?  Perhaps this is a means of assessing the quality of math instruction in K-12 education.
  8. Why do successful young golfers feel the urge to change their swing when the old one is still working?  Cases in point, Jordan Spieth and Ricky Fowler.
  9. Why would director Gus Van Sant and Universal Pictures think Americans would pay to see Anne Heche instead of Janet Leigh in the shower scene in the 1998 remake of Psycho The same goes for updated versions of The In-Laws, The Out-of-Towners, King Kong (1976), Death Wish and Footloose.
  10. And finally, a question raised by the late Glenn Brenner, sportscaster on WTOP television in Washington, D.C from 1977 to 1991.  Why do squirrels risk getting run over to gather acorns on the other side of the street when there are just as many on the side where they already are?

This list is far from exhaustive.  I encourage readers to add their own.  Who knows?  Maybe some of them will be  topics of the next 600 posts on this site.

Thank you for being there for the past five years.  For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Timber Land

NOTE:  Today’s post is the 599th since I started this project in October, 2015.  I have spent much too much time thinking about the focus or subject of #600.  I want it to be memorable, if not monumental.  Maybe an update on past topics.  Or a mea culpa reminding readers “FWIW” was occasionally zero, considering all the things I got it wrong over the past five years.  Or a philosophical piece questioning whether there is blog-life after Trump.  Or even an announcement that I am passing the torch to a new generation of bloggers when my GoDaddy hosting contract expires next spring.

But today I am inspired by former RNC chair Michael Steele, who yesterday reminded us the key to November 3rd is focus.  Make the election about Trump’s apocalyptic failure to address the pandemic.  All his “dumb ass comments” are noise which do not deserve our attention.  They should be ignored by Joe Biden and the media.  A clarion call to a frustrated satirist turned blogger.  If not Trump, someone else needs to step into the arena and produce “dumb ass statements” worthy of note.  Challenge accepted.

Do you have any sense that that privilege has isolated and put you in a cave to a certain extent, as it put me, and I think lots of White, privileged people in a cave?

~Bob Woodward/Rage

In the ultimate example of Donald Trump’s ability to project his own attitudes and behavior, he responded to Woodward’s question by accusing the Pultizer Prize winning author of being a captive of the “woke” movement.  “You really drank the Kool-Aid, didn’t you  Just listen to you.  Wow.”

Certainly not what I would have said.  But Woodward’s question made me wonder if I too sported a pair of white privilege blinders.  While I have yet to come up with a definitive answer to that specific query, I did learn something else this week.  I definitely have a mental blind spot which demonstrates how cultural experience and references affect how black and white Americans might view the same situation differently.

This epiphany followed a September 17, 2020 story in Footwear News about Kamala Harris’ choice of (drum roll) footwear during a trip to California to observe the wildfire damage and efforts to bring the disaster under control.

For a visit to one of the sites of California’s wildfires near Fresno on Tuesday, Harris was seen talking with Governor Gavin Newsom wearing a pair of Timberland boots.

The TwittterSphere and other social media sites heralded the story as an iconic cultural moment, something I did not understand until reading Brooke Leigh Howard’s column in The Daily Beast.

Timberland boots have come to be an emblem of the Black community, and this week—after a much-buzzed-about photograph of her stepping off a plane in California—vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris has owned that statement.

The move was unapologetically Black. For me, it is the kind of move that signals that I can be Black without having to code-switch.

NOTE:  Code-switch is a term used to describe the need for a person of color to tone done appearance or behavior in the company of whites.  Example:  Switching from urban radio to a Top 40 station when carpooling with white co-workers.

I had no idea.  My first inclination?  What was she supposed to wear to a wild fire?  Stilettos?  But it did not take long before I came to the conclusion this fashion statement fell within a more familiar cultural context.  As I so often do, I reverted back to the white person’s handbook Everything I Need to Know I Learned from Seinfeld.

Of course, my last cultural recollection of Timberlands was from the November 20, 1997  Seinfeld episode “The Betrayal.”  Seinfeld fans often refer to this unique story about the gang traveling to a wedding in India as “The Backward Episode.”  Jerry introduces George to his platonic friend Nina, after which George asks Jerry to “fix me up with her.”  There is only one hitch. George is wearing a new pair of Timberlands when he first meets Nina, which make him look taller. The following conversation ensues.

GEORGE:  Wait a minute.  Nina just saw me in my Timberlands!  Now I have to wear them every time I see her.

JERRY: Why?

GEORGE:  In any other shoe, I lose two inches.  I can’t have a drop down.  We were eye to eye.  I can’t go eye to chin.

Kamala Harris and her trending shoes: VP candidate makes Timbs trendThat must be it.  Kamala Harris is five feet two inches tall.  Her Timberlands make her look taller, especially knowing she would be photographed with California governor Gavin Newsom (6’3″).

Except it wasn’t.  So let me take this opportunity to thank Ms. Howard for this moment of cultural sensitivity training.  The only question left is how Donald Trump or his campaign will use this information to smear Harris.  I expect they will flood social media with ads suggesting Senator Harris is unfit to be vice-president because she is “lifting.”*

*For non-Seinfeld aficionados who may not understand this reference, check out the Wikipedia article titled, “The Stand In (Seinfeld).”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

TrumpTown

Let’s be clear.  You’re witnessing a homicidal president conveying, purposefully, a homicidal assembly to help him get reelected as President of the United States instead of protecting the health and welfare of the United States including supporters whose lives he’s willing to sacrifice.

~Carl Bernstein/CNN/September 14, 2020

Bernstein’s comment was in reference to the revelation in Bob Woodward’s book Rage that Donald Trump was quite aware he was lying to the American people when he downplayed the severity of the coronavirus pandemic in the winter and spring of 2020.  But Bernstein is only half right.  Certainly, Trump’s own words affirmed he knew such events were a high-level health risk to those who attended attended his rallies or rejected CDC guidelines.  His error is describing Trump’s behavior as homicidal.  Homicides usually do not involve willing victims.

To understand the mindset of those who still attended the rallies after hearing Trump describe how the virus is “deadly stuff” and is “passed by breathing air,” one can draw on past examples where individuals have blindly followed a leader at their own risk.  Remember, rally attendees are even warned of the danger, having to sign a waiver releasing Trump, the campaign and the host facility of liability in case of illness or death resulting from their presence at the event.

Finding an appropriate analogy was the easiest part of this post, when the projecter-in-chief triggered the obvious comparison during a taped conversation with Woodward about white privilege.  Woodward suggested both he and Trump might not fully understand the pain and anger of Black Americans, being somewhat blinded by their own privileged upbringing. To which Trump responded, “You really drank the Kool-Aid, didn’t you?  Just listen to you.  Wow.”

Deborah Layton – Author WebsiteNo, I am not comparing a Trump rally to November 18, 1978, when 918 members of Jim Jone’s Peoples Temple Agricultural Project, better know as Jonestown, Guyana, died in what Jones called a “revolutionary suicide.”  But a Trump rally sounds a lot like two earlier Jonestown ceremonies labeled “White Night Rehearsals.”  These rites of passage were described in a sworn affidavit by Deborah Layton, a Jonestown defector.

Everyone, including the children, was told to line up. As we passed through the line, we were given a small glass of red liquid to drink. We were told that the liquid contained poison and that we would die within 45 minutes. We all did as we were told. When the time came when we should have dropped dead, Rev. Jones explained that the poison was not real and that we had just been through a loyalty test. He warned us that the time was not far off when it would become necessary for us to die by our own hands.

I would have thought twice about making such a damning charge until Trump’s appearance last night at an ABC-sponsored Town Hall.  Once again, Trump stated the virus would eventually go away “with or without a vaccine.”  Moderator George Stephanopoulos pushed back on this assertion, to which Trump inexplicably pivoted in a direction that had been dismissed by U.S. experts and had proved ineffective in countries in which it had already been attempted.

And you’ll develop, you’ll develop herd — like a herd mentality. It’s going to be — it’s going to be herd developed – and that’s going to happen. That will all happen.

[NOTE:  Trump probably meant to say “herd immunity” rather than “herd mentality,” a slip of the tongue of Freudian proportions.]

The theory and practice of herd immunity is based on science (yes, science) that suggests when a certain percentage of a population becomes infected, the virus eventually runs out of people to taint and dissipates.  There is only one problem, a certain percentage of the target population especially the elderly and those with underlying conditions, will succumb to the disease in the process.  Dr. Anthony Fauci has stated between 60 to 80 percent of the U.S. population would need to be infected to reach what is called “the herd immunity threshold.”   Using the lower 60 percent figure and the current mortality rate for infected individuals (approximately one percent), the total number of COVID-19 deaths would total 1.92 million Americans.

Which brings me back to Deborah Layton’s testimony about “White Night Rehearsals.”  Tulsa, Henderson and Phoenix are exactly that.  Instead of a small cup of powered liquid with a dose of cyanide, each attendee was asked to breathe potentially lethal air.  And, urging attendees to not wear masks and sit in close quarters is no different from the “trust me” loyalty test Jim Jones required of his followers.  Therefore, last night’s quasi-endorsement of herd mentality should be a warning.

…the time was not far off when it would become necessary for us to die by our own hands.

Welcome to TrumpTown!

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Area 45

 

People always ask me about Roswell and the aliens and UFOs, and it turns out the stuff going on that’s top secret isn’t nearly as exciting as you expect.

~President Barack Obama/November 17, 2015

Every president since Harry Truman has been asked about Roswell and the Nevada Air Force testing facility commonly known as Area 51.  Due to the highly classified nature of activities conducted there, it is at the center of multiple conspiracy theories claiming the site is where an alien spacecraft crashed in the early 1950s.  Such rumors intensified as a result of the government’s unwillingness to publicly acknowledge the existence of the facility until June 2013, following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

As an admitted political junkie, I too have fantasized about unfettered access to the nation’s deepest, darkest secrets.  But not whether there are remains of aliens in an underground fault a la Independence Day.  My interests lie elsewhere.  What dirty laundry about his detractors did J. Edgar Hoover keep in a private file cabinet that protected his tenure at the FBI for 37 years?  And of course, despite presidential promises to the contrary, why has each administration continued to withhold from public view still classified documents pertaining to John Kennedy’s assassination?

It makes you wonder if Jack Nicholson’s portrayal of Colonel Nathan Jessup in A Few Good Men is a metaphor for a paternalistic federal government which believes the American people “can’t handle the truth.”  Both in the past and in the present. Has the White House under Donald Trump become Area 45, a federal facility shrouded in secrecy protected by an attorney general who sees FOIA as an annoyance rather than a tool to ensure transparency within the public sector?

Yesterday, thanks to Bob Woodward, Donald Trump, in his own words, confessed, “You’re damn right I ordered the Code Red!”  However, instead of being hauled off by MPs, Trump suggested he has done it more than once and will do it again.  In foreign policy.  About systemic racism.  Bragging about classified weapons systems.

As I’ve referenced in a previous post, comedian David Steinberg revels in those occasions, e.g. Watergate, when we get “to see the torn underwear under America’s tuxedo.”  And despite concerns to the contrary, we always seem capable of handling the truth.  That is why on his first day in office, President Joe Biden needs to heed the advice of those who recommend the formation of a bi-partisan Truth and Reconciliation Commission.  Although they may not admit it publicly, many Republicans and conservatives, if they truly fear Biden will usher in an era where unrestrained presidential power will be used to implement a radical leftist agenda, should also welcome such a panel.

Woodward has chiseled a peephole into Area 45.  To understand the bigger picture and address the legal and moral shortcomings which allowed it to be constructed in the first place, we need to unlock the gates and air out the windowless recesses. Citizens have a right to see an unredacted version of the Mueller Report.  The interpreters’ notes from Trump meetings with Vladimir Putin.  The complete transcript of Trump’s phone call with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky.  Communications between the White House, Trump Campaign Committee and the Department of Justice related to ongoing investigations, pardons and commutations and the firing of district attorneys and inspectors general.  And more.

Not only can we handle the truth, we must demand it and put every succeeding occupant of the Oval Office on notice that this is the standard going forward.

EPILOGUE

In 2010, I team-taught a course at Miami University titled, “Entrepreneurship and the Future of Journalism,” with a colleague in the Journalism Department.  While much of the syllabus focused on changes in what interests news consumers and the impact of technology, my goal was to help these aspiring reporters and editors think like entrepreneurs.  Lesson #1 was, “Every potential story is an opportunity, but more importantly it is a call to do more homework than the story requires.”  To no one’s surprise, I would use Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein as examples.  In particular, demonstrating how what began as a back-page story about a break-in at the Watergate proved to be so much more as Wood/Stein (as they were often referred to by Washington Post editor-in-chief Ben Bradlee) kept peeling away the layers of the onion.  Each time revealing more of the saga.

At the end of the lesson, I wondered aloud where the next Woodward or Bernstein would come from.  What epic story would bring them to the forefront of journalism?  Win a Pulitzer Prize? Yesterday, we got the answer.  The next Bob Woodward is still Bob Woodward.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Cause, Cause, Effect

 

Sometimes I find choosing the appropriate metaphor for what is happening in the United State a challenge.  Today is NOT one of the occasions.  Why?  Because two events in the past 48 hours–Hurricane Laura and violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin following the shooting of Jacob Blake–share a common teaching moment.  Both remind us any attempt to isolate the cause and effect of an event is an oversimplification of the situation.

Understanding this helps us separate the symptoms from the root cause that trigger the chronology from one state of being to the next. When examining this sequence of activity it is important to understand it is not “this” caused “that.”  It is more like “this” caused “this” that eventually leads to “this.”  My worst fear is there is no “that.”  There is no terminal episode.  And that fear played out two days ago in Kenosha.

Let’s begin with Laura.  This morning the coastal area of Louisiana woke up to massive destruction which one might say was the direct result of a category 4 hurricane.  But this storm was different from others which have ravaged the Gulf coast in the past.  Historically, hurricanes have gathered strength from the time they form off the African coast, their power derived from the long journey across the warm waters of the southern Atlantic.  In contrast, Laura formed just east of the Virgin Island and remained a tropical storm until it entered the Gulf of Mexico.  Then, it grew from a rain event into a category 4 hurricane in less than two days, unprecedented in the annals of National Weather Service records.

This was no accident.  The speed at which the storm intensified was due to the record high water temperatures in the Gulf.  Again, no accident.  Take one more step backwards and we see the deviation in water temperature is due to a failure to address the effects of climate change.  Due to a belief by some that economic growth and environmental protection are incompatible.  Cause, cause, cause, cause, effect.  But does it really end there?  If Laura-like storms become the rule rather than the exception, future economic, social and national security consequences are yet to come.

When I began this post, I was not quite sure which development was the metaphor which explains the other.  But the chain of events in Kenosha make it a better illustration of the “cause, cause, effect syndrome.”  Rather than a timeline, perhaps a road map covering 244 years of American history is the better teaching tool.

Our trip begins in Philadelphia in 1789 with the adoption of the U.S. Constitution.  Article I, Section 3 is a good starting point.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.

Talk about political correctness.  The word “slave” does not appear in the document.  Instead, slaves are referred to as “all other People.”  And are undervalued at three-fifths of “free Persons.”  This morning, Eddie Glaude, Jr., professor of African American Studies at Princeton University, labeled this provision the “code of slavery” which, even though addressed in the Thirteenth Amendment, remains the underpinning of structural racism in American and especially among some police officers.  The life of these “other Persons” still is not worth the same as we “free Persons.”

The second leg of our journey is a long one, lasting 155 years, during which we keep trying to scale the mountain of systemic bias in hopes of seeing the promise land on the other side.  There have been temporary glimpses of that vision but it is never fully realized.  And like Moses, far too many of those who lead us on this journey will not, themselves, enjoy the rewards of their efforts.

Finally, at warp speed, we arrive in Kenosha, Wisconsin where Jacob Blake, a 29 year-old black father of three, is immobilized by a policeman who grabs his shirt and then shoots him seven times in the back.  This is the mid-point in the cause, cause, effect cycle.  The root cause is the “three-fifths compromise.”  Its lasting effect precipitates Jim Crow as too many Americans refuse to accept the Thirteenth Amendment.  And the continuing debate about the value of a black life opens the door to police brutality when dealing with people of color.

But, as mentioned above, it is the midpoint, not the end.  Our journey from 1789 to the present continues.  Anger over the shooting of Jacob Blake leads to protests in the streets of Kenosha.  And sadly, despite pleas by Blake’s parents not to dishonor their son through acts of violence and destruction, that anger precipitates disorder and lawlessness.  Which causes a 17 year-old with a semi-automatic weapon to drive to Kenosha from his home in Grayslake, Illinois because, as he tells the right-wing website The Daily Caller founded by Tucker Carlson, the night before he kills two protesters and critically injures another, “People are getting injured, and our job is to protect this business.”  More cause, cause, effect.

If there is anyone who honestly believes this is where the story ends, I have a portfolio of penny stocks I am willing to sell you.  The only question is whether this resort to vigilantism, which appears to have been ignored, even supported, by Kenosha police, causes more violence as once peaceful protesters now feel compelled to protect themselves from these self-appointed guardians of the citizenry.  Or will it be a long overdue wake-up call to more Americans who now understand a black man, who at worse, for the crime of having a knife in his vehicle, is gunned down by police while a white teenager who just murdered two people is allowed to spend the night in his own bed.

The destination is still uncertain.  Tonight, we may get the answer to that question.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP