Category Archives: Culture

Leaving Mar-a-Lago, Part II

Just as HBO presented the documentary Leaving Neverland in two parts, yesterday’s post was just half the story. Part one of the Michael Jackson saga was about the good times, the excitement by two young boys to be part of the entertainer’s world and inner circle, to be made to feel special and have access to privileges most people only dream about.

Part two was about redemption. Wade Robson and Jimmy Safechuck eventually admit the personal toll their secret had on their mental and physical health as well as their families. Both have married and have children. For Robson, the moment of illumination comes as his son approaches the age at which he first encounters Jackson. He cannot imagine that anyone would do to his son what he experienced or that he would allow it to happen.

Projection, a defense mechanism subconsciously employed to cope with difficult feelings and emotions, is usually something that must be avoided. It prevents one from confronting or dealing with unwanted truths. But in this case, seeing his young son cast in his personal nightmare gave him the strength to finally break the emotional bond which previously prevented Robson from sharing his story.

The road to redemption is not without potholes and speed bumps. Robson, Safechuck and their families, on several occasions, countered accusations by others of Jackson’s abuse. Although unpaid except for the perks of being Jackson’s “friend,” job one was protecting Michael.

Which brings me to the central player in part two of Leaving Mar-a-Lago, Michael Cohen. No surprise. In his opening statement before the House Oversight Committee, he echos Robson’s and Safechuck’s narrative of seduction and complicity.

It is painful to admit that I was motivated by ambition at times. It is even more painful to admit that many times I ignored my conscience and acted loyal to a man when I should not have. Sitting here today, it seems unbelievable that I was so mesmerized by Donald Trump that I was willing to do things for him that I knew were absolutely wrong.

Opening Statement, Michael D. Cohen, February 29, 2019

There is one major difference between Robson, Safechuck and Michael Cohen. While all three talked about the lasting effect of their association with Jackson and Trump, respectively, Michael Jackson is dead. He will not abuse another young child. Trump is still very much with us. Which is why Cohen concluded with the following statement. “My loyalty to Mr. Trump has cost me everything. I will not sit back, say nothing and allow him to do the same to the country.”

But perhaps Cohen’s most ominous warning was to those who do not understand what is personally at stake. “…people that follow Mr. Trump as I did blindly are going to suffer the same consequences that I’m suffering.” In other words, we are much more likely to become the next Wade Robson, Jimmy Safechuck or Michael Cohen than we will ever become the next Michael Jackson or Donald Trump.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

Leaving Mar-a-Lago

After watching the four-hour documentary Leaving Neverland which follows the seduction and sexual abuse of two young fans by Michael Jackson, I was left with the same feeling I have about seemingly rational people who continue to support Donald Trump. Yet, as I listened to the boys’ mothers both describe how they could never imagine such “a gentle human being” doing such terrible things to their children, the truth was more than evident.

What Joy Robson (Wade’s mother), Stephanie Safechuck (Jimmy’s mother) and Trump’s base have in common is that they lived and, in some cases, continue to live in a perpetual Neverland where they are asked to protect real-life Tinkerbells (Jackson and Trump) by closing their eyes and being told to BELIEVE. In Jackson’s case, just like Peter Pan, he takes Wade and Jimmy by the hand and offers them the opportunity to fly. Not magically, but in private jets. And he promises adventure, whether accompanying him on world tours or spending time at Jackson’s ranch, the embodiment of every child’s dream environment. It helps you understand the lure, the seduction. In a play on an old standard, “How you gonna keep ’em in the three-bedroom, two bath ranch in Simi Valley or Brisbane after they’ve seen Neverland?”

This is no different than Trump, in 2015, descending on a golden escalator asking Americans who lived in three-bedroom, two bath ranch homes or worse to go on an adventure. And just as Jackson won the trust of the Robson and Safechuck families by spending time in their living rooms, Trump created the same atmosphere at his rallies. While not as intimate as a private home, the attendees were captivated that a celebrity would come to their town and spend time with them. Jackson showered his prey with gifts and promises to help jump-start their careers. Trump handed out red gimme caps and promised to turn back the clock. Both are equally intoxicating.

Walking the dog this afternoon, I wondered if Leaving Neverland director Dan Reed would ever consider producing an equally meticulous video account of the Trump campaign and presidency. What made Leaving Neverland so compelling was how the focus on these two young boys put a human face on the pain and suffering Jackson caused his victims and their families. I wondered who Reed would pick as his subjects. And then, as I checked the on-line news, there they were.

CNBC reported “the last Chevy Cruze sedan rolled off the line at about 2 p.m Wednesday headed for a dealership in Florida.” Meet Bryan Keeley, a GM employee who voted for Trump in a county which gave the Republican candidate a 30 point margin over Hillary Clinton. Keeley, a 26 year GM veteran, told Bloomberg News last November, “I thought he was going to do miracles for us, so did a lot of other autoworkers.”

Or consider Juan Quintero who is the subject of a front page article in today’s Washington Post. Quintero had been employed for 18 years at the Trump National Golf Club in Hopewell Junction, N.Y. But that was half the story. Quinero was so trusted by the Trump family, he also “put in five more hours each day as a contractor at the 171-acre hunting retreat called Leather Hill Preserve, which serves as a private weekend playground for President Trump’s sons and the property’s co-owners.”

There was just one problem. Quintero is a Mexican immigrant who was working illegally in the United States. And just as Michael Jackson would jettison two young boys who worshiped him and lied for him, the Trump organization abandoned Quintero when he became a potential embarrassment. Quintero: “All of the years you give them, and they just let you go.”

I would have added a third, a coal-miner from West Virginia, but I do not have a face or a name. During the campaign, Trump sprinkled his pixie dust on the coal industry and asked them to believe. Recently, he bragged on (drum roll) Fox News, “I’ve turned West Virginia around because of what I’ve done environmentally with coal.” Perhaps he should have checked with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, which reported mining jobs in December 2018 declined .47 percent over December 2017 or his own Bureau of Economic Analysis which reported State GDP was 0.0 percent, last among the 50 states. Yet Trump’s approval rating in West Virginia stands at 62 percent, the highest in the nation.

Wade Robson was five years old when he first met Michael Jackson. Twenty six years passed before he shared his story with Dan Reed. How many years will have to pass before the gold veneer rubs off and an autoworker in Ohio, a Mexican immigrant who has served his employer loyally for 18 years or a coal miner in West Virginia recognizes their misplaced allegiance to Donald Trump was no more than a children’s fairy tale and that it is time to stop believing in place called Mar-a-Lago.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

Cultural APnea

The screen shot, below, from the Associated Press was captured at 7:16 am this morning.

It is the third day in a row the lead has been about a disgruntled actor, who is accused of staging a fake hate crime, to enhance his public persona.  Before January 29, 2019, I would venture an overwhelming majority of Americans did not know who Jussie Smollett was nor did they care.

In the meantime, a 49 year-old Coast Guard officer has been charged with stockpiling weapons for the alleged purpose of killing the Democratic leadership in Congress, several Democratic presidential candidates and journalists critical of Donald Trump.  His hit list consisted of 22 names including:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schmer
Senator Richard Blumenthal (CT)
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (NY)
Senator Cory Booker (NJ)
Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)
Senator Kamala Harris (CA)
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY)
MSNBC Host Joe Scarborough
MSNBC Host Chris Hayes
CNN Host Chris Cuomo
CNN Host Van Jones

In the old days of print journalism, the lead story was said to be “above the fold.”  The digital equivalent is a news service’s home page.  Do the digital editors at the Associated Press truly believe Jussie Smollett deserves more attention or represents a greater threat to the country than Lt. Christopher Hanson?  I hope not, but the evidence suggests otherwise.

Trumpism does not exist without its twin Kardashianism with its focus on celebrity where fame, not character or accomplishment, is the measure of success. Kudos to the FBI and the Coast Guard for averting this potential disaster.  My fear is Lt. Hanson is not alone.  How many more Lt. Hansons are stockpiling weapons and creating hit lists?  Instead of sending reporters to the Midwest to continue interviewing Obama voters who like Donald Trump, maybe those resources would be better devoted to understanding why individuals who claim they support the “law and order” guy have so little respect for what the term actually means.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Yes Santa, There Is a Virginia

In September, 1897, an eight year-old girl named Virginia O’Hanlon, at her father’s urging, wrote a letter to the editor of the New York Sun asking whether Santa Claus was real.  In what became the most reprinted editorial of all time, Francis Pharcellus Church, a member of the Sun’s editorial staff,  penned the response.  Without giving a definitive answer, Church addressed the philosophical underpinnings behind the Kris Kringle legend and why the spirit of St. Nick was important.

As I have mentioned before, I am a native born Virginian, and the events of the past week have been a time to reflect on what life in Richmond was like in the 1950s and 1960s, and how the remnants of that era continue to emerge from time to time in modern day society.  I beg your indulgence as I share a few childhood memories.

  • I attended segregated schools until 1966 when a handful of black students were admitted to Thomas Jefferson High School.
  • There were restricted housing developments in Richmond in which Jews were unwelcomed, much less African-Americans.
  • Restaurants and movie theaters were also segregated.  From 1933 until the late 1960s, the only places African-Americans could see movies or live performances were the Booker-T and Hippodrome theaters located in the predominantly minority areas.
  • At the University of Virginia, I worked in the Office of University Relations under the work study program.  One of my tasks was compiling the minority enrollment report for the then Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW).  In 1970, there were less than 100 black students in a total student body of more than 7,500.
  • Three hundred and fifty years after the founding of Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the new world, the ruling class in the state–senators, congressmen, governors and state legislators–still consisted largely of members of the First Families of Virginia Society, Caucasians with European roots.

So, as I watch the news about Governor Ed Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring, I wonder where is the modern day Francis Church who, if asked whether either or both should resign from office, will take the same approach as Church did with young Miss O’Hanlon?  The value of the question is not a yes or no answer.  The question is an opportunity to re-examine and reflect on the circumstances and awakened curiosity which made us inquire in the first place.

Instead of a battle over who will sit in the governor’s chair for the next two and a half years, this is a much bigger and more important conflict.  What is it about race in America that would make two intelligent white men think it is okay to dress up as black men?  What is it about any institution–educational, professional or commercial–which would not call out someone associated with it for thinking it was okay to post a picture like the one in the Eastern Virginia Medical Center yearbook?  And finally, as a nation, will we ever be able to address the root causes that permit such behavior?

POSTCRIPT

Which brings me to the other issue in this three act drama, the sexual assault charges brought against Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax.  As has been the case since the beginning of the #metoo era, the tragedy is not that a number of powerful men in politics, entertainment and business have had to answer for their behavior.  The real tragedy is, more than a year later, we have not come up with a more reasonable way to pursue the truth in what is often he said/she said situations.  Or not to apply a “one size fits all” approach to every case.

Without making any judgment about the charges against Fairfax, the comparison to Christine Blasey Ford baffles me.  In Ford’s case, if her account is true, she did not follow either of her alleged attackers into a bedroom.  She was on her way to the upstairs bathroom when she said she was forced into a bedroom and assaulted by one boy while the other watched.  If we give Fairfax’s accuser the same benefit of the doubt, she admits she willingly went to his hotel room and kissed him.  She still has the right to say, “That’s enough.”  I know, I will never be able to understand what it is like to be women in this situation.  But this was 2004, and there had been several high-profile cases in which other women had similar experiences.  One would hope members of both sexes would learn from these experiences.

There is another feature of this case which deserves attention.  It was not a power situation.  Neither party worked for the other.  Therefore, neither was required to have any contact with the other if the alleged victim had felt violated.  Neither feared losing their job.  And that may be the key to getting to the truth.  As has been mentioned by several reporters and pundits, one thing you might look for is contemporaneous documentation, e.g. talking to a friend about the experience.  But I can understand a woman, concerned about the potential shame associated with the incident, might keep it to herself.  But there is one more data point.  Did Fairfax and his accuser have any subsequent contact, even something as insignificant as a text or email?  Until we have more information, the media and politicians on both sides of the aisle would be wise to defer to due process.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

I Know It’s Wrong

The title of today’s post is also the name of a comedy album by Dana Gould in which he claims there is nothing about which jokes cannot be made.  To make his point, the title track explains how he atoned for once calling a classmate “retarded.”  To make amends, he donated $5,000 to a charity that supports the mentally disabled.

From the “No Good Deed Goes Unpunished” department, Gould then goes on how the reward for his generosity was a daily barrage of mail and email asking for more money.  Something with which we can all identify.  He concludes by asking, “Why would they spend $10,000 trying to get me to give another $5,000?”  The punchline?  “Because they’re retarded.”

Those of you who know me personally or via this blog must realize by now I have a warped sense of humor.  And there have been multiple occasions over the past three years when I have chosen not to push the envelope with a parody or analysis which pushes the boundaries of decency.  Until this morning.

As a native born Virginian, I just cannot get the Ralph Northam saga out of my head.  Not the picture in the Eastern Virginia Medical School yearbook.  The defining moment of this story was the press conference at which Governor Northam admitted he had applied shoe polish to his face to imitate Michael Jackson during a 1984 dance contest in San Antonio.

Related imageHere is a picture of Michael Jackson in 1984.  My question?  Why would a white person think he needed to blacken his face to impersonate Jackson?  Is it not more likely a person of color would need to use WhiteOut if he or she wanted to dress up as the King of Pop?

Before you start a barrage of comments, I admit, “I KNOW IT’S WRONG!”  But if Dana Gould is correct, it is still joke-worthy.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP