Category Archives: Media

…AND the American Way

Image result for mort sahl lbjBefore there was George Carlin or Lewis Black, there was Mort Sahl.  In August 1960, Sahl appeared on the cover of Time Magazine and was lauded as the person who could, through social satire, help voters understand the choices in the upcoming presidential election. In what seems unimaginable today, Sahl befriended several presidents despite his sometimes critical commentaries and was often invited to accompany them on Air Force One, which resulted in my all-time favorite Mort Sahl story which, 50 years later, I can only paraphrase.

I was flying back to Washington, DC from California with President Kennedy when the plane hit an air pocket and dropped several hundred feet.  Kennedy comes out of his private office in the back of the plane and walks right up to me.  He says, “Sahl, you realize what might have just happened don’t you?  If we had crashed, your name would have been in small print.” Ironically, the same thing happened again just recently when I was on Air Force One with Nixon.  Nixon walks to the front of the plane and says to all on board, staff and press, “I hope you realize how close the country came to losing its leadership.”That tells you everything you need to know about these two men.

Mort Sahl released 10 comedy albums between 1958 (At Sunset) and 1973 (Sing a Song of Watergate).  Of all these hours of what can only be described as “streams of consciousness,” one bit seems more relevant today than all the rest.  Again, I will paraphrase.

I know they did not mean it this way, but I never understood why the introduction to the television show Superman proclaimed ‘…this strange visitor from another planet…fights a never ending battle for truth, justice and the American way.”  In school, we were told truth and justice WERE the American way.  But when you add the AND, doesn’t that mean, “There is truth and justice AND then there is the American way.”

For the record, the original description of the Man of Steel, when he first appeared in DC Comics in 1941, did not include “and the American way.”  It was added when the television adaptation Adventures of Superman debuted in September 1952.

Sadly, it appears Sahl was on to something.  Consider the following.

  • Jeffrey Epstein receives a slap on the wrist for running a prostitution ring with under-aged girls.
  • Attorney General William Barr does not believe Congress, much less American voters, have a right to see the complete account of Russian interference in a presidential election.
  • The Illinois state attorney drops charges against actor Jussie Smollet, even though evidence suggests he faked a hate crime which cost the Chicago police time and over $125,000 in resources to investigate.
  • More is being written about the consequences to the children of the parents indicted for gaming the college admissions system than the impact on qualified applicants deprived of educational opportunities.  And despite the fact many of these students posed for staged photographs or provided writing samples that were used by SAT surrogates, “details in court documents indicate students were unaware of the parents’ actions.”   (Source: USA Today, April 12, 2019)  [NOTE: The USA Today story was accompanied by a slide show about Lori Loughlin’s daughter titled, “Olivia Jade Giannulli: Her Life in Pictures.”  Unfortunately, it did not include a mug shot of her with her parents.]
  • And of course, there is Donald Trump who lied, telling anyone who would listen that the Mueller Report had “totally exonerated” him of obstructing justice.  It’s as if the truth is Trump’s Kryptonite.

In July 2015, a CNN/ORC poll showed 95 percent of registered voters claimed honesty and trustworthiness were important characteristics of the next president. Likewise, in theory, most Americans believe in equal justice under the law.  However, as we learned in 2016, theory and behavior are two different things.  The question in 2020 is, “Does behavior change when theory meets reality?’  Consider the new-found support for the Affordable Care Act and it’s impact on the 2018 mid-terms.  In theory, Republicans could attack it.  But once voters realized what was at stake if ACA was repealed, their preferences changed.

So, what could be a winning message for Democrats next year?  Now that you know what it feels like when you have leaders who constantly lie to you, treat differently those who profess loyalty to those who do not and put personal gain above the national interest, remember when America was great.  Not when there was truth, justice AND the American way.  It was when truth and justice WAS the American way.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

Gramm Crackers

Speculation seems to be the order of the day.  So I thought I’d join in.  The question?  Which of the following is most interesting and about which we are least informed?  The contents of the Mueller Report?  Or who is the front runner for the 2020 Democratic nomination for president?  Without any real data–the actual REPORT in the case of the former and VOTES in the latter–pundits are, as Bob Dylan reminds us, just blowing in the wind.  (Query:  Does the noise from political pundits blowing in the wind cause cancer?)

While I have questioned the process by which William Barr has shared information about the Mueller Report with us, I am holding my tongue on the content until I get a chance to read it.  So today, I will take my first shot at coverage of the 2020 race for Democratic nomination.

Since March 31, the emphasis has been on fundraising by the plethora of presidential aspirants.  Much has been made about the a candidate’s total take, the average size of donations and the number of contributors.  This information is readily available as all candidates for federal office must file quarterly campaign financials with the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).  Therefore, we can assume the numbers for the first quarter of 2019 are accurate.  Here are the results for the top four fundraisers.

Bernie Sanders/$18.2 million
Kamala Harris/$12.1 million
Beto O’Rourke/$9.4 million
Pete Buttigieg/$7 million

But as my late friend Michie Slaughter used to remind us, “Sometimes the things that are important are hard to measure, and the things that are easy to measure are not important.”

Related imageWhich brings me to the title of today’s post.  In 1995, Texas Republican Senator Phil Gramm saw himself as the heir apparent to Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, saving the country from another four years of Bill Clinton.  He announced his candidacy immediately following the 1994 midterm elections.  In February 1995, Gramm raised $4.1 million ($6.8 million in current dollars) not in one quarter, but at one event, a dinner in Dallas which was billed in the New York Times as “one of the largest takes for a single campaign event in American political history.”  By end of his campaign one year later, Gramm’s campaign had raised and spent a total of $35.81 million ($59.4 million in current dollars).

Since there is no record of President Gramm, you know how the story ends.  What you may be too young to have experienced or too old to recall is that he abandoned his bid for the White House on February 25, 1996, just days after the first Republican votes were cast in Iowa.  Of the 96,762 caucus attendees, Gramm finished fifth with 9,055 or 9.35 percent. He clearly had not cracked the code for a successful run for president. (Historical Footnote:  Is it any surprise a man who spent $3,954 per vote in Iowa, later as chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, deregulated the banking industry, an action which was largely responsible for the financial crisis of 2008?)

During a phone call with a relative this week, he asked my opinion of the Democratic candidates.  While I admitted I have no idea who will eventually end up on top, I suggested that Buttigieg was someone to watch.  When asked why, I found it hard to explain.  The closest I came was my reaction to his appearances on CNN, MSNBC and last Friday night on “Real Time with Bill Maher.”  He did not lecture or talk at me.  He did not tell me what was good for me or the country.  He talked about what he believed was important and how he felt about the future.  And his curiosity.  “I cannot help but think what things will be like in 2054 when I am the age of the current incumbent.”  When asked by religious skeptic Maher whether there was a conflict between his pursuit of knowledge and his faith, Mayor Pete replied, “Do you think you’ve figured it all out?  I haven’t.”  Even a devout agnostic can live with that.

Phil Gramm’s campaign had just the opposite experience.  According to the New York Times, “Internal campaign memorandums suggest that even with a huge budget for television commercials, Mr. Gramm had image problems with the voters.”  It became known as the “Yuck” factor, a reference to a story about his wife Wendy’s initial reaction upon meeting her future spouse.

After four years of cringing every time Donald Trump appears on television, maybe all we are looking for is someone with whom we are comfortable.  I have no idea how you measure that.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

Cultural APnea

The screen shot, below, from the Associated Press was captured at 7:16 am this morning.

It is the third day in a row the lead has been about a disgruntled actor, who is accused of staging a fake hate crime, to enhance his public persona.  Before January 29, 2019, I would venture an overwhelming majority of Americans did not know who Jussie Smollett was nor did they care.

In the meantime, a 49 year-old Coast Guard officer has been charged with stockpiling weapons for the alleged purpose of killing the Democratic leadership in Congress, several Democratic presidential candidates and journalists critical of Donald Trump.  His hit list consisted of 22 names including:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schmer
Senator Richard Blumenthal (CT)
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (NY)
Senator Cory Booker (NJ)
Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)
Senator Kamala Harris (CA)
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY)
MSNBC Host Joe Scarborough
MSNBC Host Chris Hayes
CNN Host Chris Cuomo
CNN Host Van Jones

In the old days of print journalism, the lead story was said to be “above the fold.”  The digital equivalent is a news service’s home page.  Do the digital editors at the Associated Press truly believe Jussie Smollett deserves more attention or represents a greater threat to the country than Lt. Christopher Hanson?  I hope not, but the evidence suggests otherwise.

Trumpism does not exist without its twin Kardashianism with its focus on celebrity where fame, not character or accomplishment, is the measure of success. Kudos to the FBI and the Coast Guard for averting this potential disaster.  My fear is Lt. Hanson is not alone.  How many more Lt. Hansons are stockpiling weapons and creating hit lists?  Instead of sending reporters to the Midwest to continue interviewing Obama voters who like Donald Trump, maybe those resources would be better devoted to understanding why individuals who claim they support the “law and order” guy have so little respect for what the term actually means.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Individual 1 v. Article I

Related imageThere has not been an abdication of national leadership like this since British King Edward VIII announced on December 10, 1936, he would relinquish the Crown to marry Wallace Simpson.  Yesterday, Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, when it comes to the Article 1, Section 9 enumerated powers of Congress to appropriate and draw money from the Treasury, put on his best impersonation of Gilda Radner’s SNL personna Emily Litella, telling the Nation, “Never mind!”  Consider the following exchange with a reporter following a meeting of the Republican caucus.

REPORTER: Are you concerned about the president, when he says, I’m unsure about the deal here, but he suggests he might use transfer authority to move money around? The pot of money is only so big, and if some of those monies be put towards these DNS priorities or moved around from Defense or disaster aid, and could that create a problem?

MITCHELL:  First, I think he should sign the bill.  And second, I think he ought to feel free to use whatever tools he can legally use to enhance his effort to secure the border.  So, no, I would not be troubled by that.

Too bad not one of the reporters participating in this gaggle followed up with the obvious question, “Senator, would you consider the re-appropriation of federal funds without Congressional approval a legal use of executive power?”  And just imagine what Mitchell’s response would have been if President Obama had diverted disaster relief funds used to mitigate tornadoes and flooding in Kentucky to fix the water system in Flint, Michigan or used an executive order to address what he saw as a national priority.

Oh wait!  You don’t have to imagine it.  Here is McConnell’s response to Obama’s executive order to extend temporary protection for “dreamers” when Congress failed to renew DACA.  Claiming the 2014 mid-term elections should have sent a clear message to the President where the nation stood on the issue.  “It would be the equivalent of waving a red flag in front of a bull.”  Then House Speaker John Boehner went one step farther, referring to the President as “Emperor Obama.”

For you non-political junkies, here is a reminder of the “will of the people.”  In the 2014 mid-terms, Republican candidates for the House of Representatives garnered 39.9 million of 78.8 million total votes cast (50.6%).  In 2018, Democrats pulled 59.5 million out of 110.1 total ballots (53.2%) for House races.  So much for listening to the voters, Mitch.

Call it what you wish, but Mitch McConnell and the GOP daily practice what is the Constitutional equivalent of “situational ethics.”  They believe in a literal interpretation of the founding documents until it no longer serves their purpose.  For the moment, it appears federal judges have not pulled a McConnell when it comes to their Article III powers and responsibilities.  If and when Donald Trump tries to move a single dollar from disaster relief for Puerto Rico or California, one can only hope all those attorneys who advertise on television or send us mail offering to represent us in class action suits, file cases on behalf of those who have lost their homes and businesses during hurricanes and wild fires.

Trump must be counting his blessings the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York does not have general oversight responsibility for the executive branch.  Otherwise, when it comes to violating his oath “to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Individual 1 would once again be considered an unindicted co-conspirator.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Yes Santa, There Is a Virginia

In September, 1897, an eight year-old girl named Virginia O’Hanlon, at her father’s urging, wrote a letter to the editor of the New York Sun asking whether Santa Claus was real.  In what became the most reprinted editorial of all time, Francis Pharcellus Church, a member of the Sun’s editorial staff,  penned the response.  Without giving a definitive answer, Church addressed the philosophical underpinnings behind the Kris Kringle legend and why the spirit of St. Nick was important.

As I have mentioned before, I am a native born Virginian, and the events of the past week have been a time to reflect on what life in Richmond was like in the 1950s and 1960s, and how the remnants of that era continue to emerge from time to time in modern day society.  I beg your indulgence as I share a few childhood memories.

  • I attended segregated schools until 1966 when a handful of black students were admitted to Thomas Jefferson High School.
  • There were restricted housing developments in Richmond in which Jews were unwelcomed, much less African-Americans.
  • Restaurants and movie theaters were also segregated.  From 1933 until the late 1960s, the only places African-Americans could see movies or live performances were the Booker-T and Hippodrome theaters located in the predominantly minority areas.
  • At the University of Virginia, I worked in the Office of University Relations under the work study program.  One of my tasks was compiling the minority enrollment report for the then Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW).  In 1970, there were less than 100 black students in a total student body of more than 7,500.
  • Three hundred and fifty years after the founding of Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the new world, the ruling class in the state–senators, congressmen, governors and state legislators–still consisted largely of members of the First Families of Virginia Society, Caucasians with European roots.

So, as I watch the news about Governor Ed Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring, I wonder where is the modern day Francis Church who, if asked whether either or both should resign from office, will take the same approach as Church did with young Miss O’Hanlon?  The value of the question is not a yes or no answer.  The question is an opportunity to re-examine and reflect on the circumstances and awakened curiosity which made us inquire in the first place.

Instead of a battle over who will sit in the governor’s chair for the next two and a half years, this is a much bigger and more important conflict.  What is it about race in America that would make two intelligent white men think it is okay to dress up as black men?  What is it about any institution–educational, professional or commercial–which would not call out someone associated with it for thinking it was okay to post a picture like the one in the Eastern Virginia Medical Center yearbook?  And finally, as a nation, will we ever be able to address the root causes that permit such behavior?

POSTCRIPT

Which brings me to the other issue in this three act drama, the sexual assault charges brought against Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax.  As has been the case since the beginning of the #metoo era, the tragedy is not that a number of powerful men in politics, entertainment and business have had to answer for their behavior.  The real tragedy is, more than a year later, we have not come up with a more reasonable way to pursue the truth in what is often he said/she said situations.  Or not to apply a “one size fits all” approach to every case.

Without making any judgment about the charges against Fairfax, the comparison to Christine Blasey Ford baffles me.  In Ford’s case, if her account is true, she did not follow either of her alleged attackers into a bedroom.  She was on her way to the upstairs bathroom when she said she was forced into a bedroom and assaulted by one boy while the other watched.  If we give Fairfax’s accuser the same benefit of the doubt, she admits she willingly went to his hotel room and kissed him.  She still has the right to say, “That’s enough.”  I know, I will never be able to understand what it is like to be women in this situation.  But this was 2004, and there had been several high-profile cases in which other women had similar experiences.  One would hope members of both sexes would learn from these experiences.

There is another feature of this case which deserves attention.  It was not a power situation.  Neither party worked for the other.  Therefore, neither was required to have any contact with the other if the alleged victim had felt violated.  Neither feared losing their job.  And that may be the key to getting to the truth.  As has been mentioned by several reporters and pundits, one thing you might look for is contemporaneous documentation, e.g. talking to a friend about the experience.  But I can understand a woman, concerned about the potential shame associated with the incident, might keep it to herself.  But there is one more data point.  Did Fairfax and his accuser have any subsequent contact, even something as insignificant as a text or email?  Until we have more information, the media and politicians on both sides of the aisle would be wise to defer to due process.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP