There is no justification for what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania Saturday afternoon. It was an unacceptable assault on democracy. And America is fortunate the shooter was a less skilled marksman than Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray. In a rare moment of agreement, both President Biden and Donald Trump called on their supporters to “cool down the temperature.” This period of reconciliation did not last 24 hours.
Biden went on national television Sunday night and reminded Americans, “We settle our differences at the ballot box, not with bullets” and pulled ads his campaign planned to run during the Republican National Convention. Trump sent his supporters a fundraising letter which included a stylized version of AP photographer Evan Vucci’s image of the blooded candidate raising his fist in the air.
The question that haunts me today is, “Will Americans let a misguided 20 year-old with his father’s AR-15 decide the future direction of our country?” Thomas Matthew Crooks must have thought he could. Which brings me back to my previous posts, especial the one from July 9, titled, “An Unwitting Asset.” The 2024 election, regardless of the Republican nominee, should never be about an individual. “The soul of America,” about which Biden so often refers, has been under assault for decades. When Democrats, myself included, focus on Trump’s flaws, we drop the ball.
I apologize for repeating myself, but the vision of America that will be laid out in Milwaukee did not begin with Donald Trump. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich, Edwin Feulner and Joseph Coors. [Note: Weyrich, a la Gene Wilder in Young Frankenstein, insisted his last name was pronounced “Wy-Rick” instead of “Way-Rich.] Weyrich, a conservative commentator, political activist and ordained deacon in the Melkite Greek Catholic Church, recruited Coors, patriarch of the brewery which bears his family name, to underwrite creation of the Heritage Foundation. Feulner, after serving as an aide to Congressman Phil Crane (R-IL), became Heritage’s first president.
If you think Project 2025 is the first time the Heritage Foundation played a major role in setting the agenda for a Republican administration, think again. In 1981, the foundation provided policy guidance for incoming president Ronald Reagan including a document with 2,000 specific recommendations titled (drum roll) “Mandate for Leadership.” Sound familiar? Heritage exerted similar influence during the George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush administrations.
Following the announcement of Trump’s entry into the 2016 election cycle, the foundation was no fan of the future president. Heritage Action director Michael Needham, during a Fox News appearance, said, “Donald Trump’s a clown.” However, after Trump secured the GOP nomination, the Foundation forwarded a list of potential appointees, according to the New York Times, drawn from “a 3,000-name searchable database of trusted movement conservatives from around the country who were eager to serve in a post-Obama government.” (Again I ask, “Sound familiar?”)
Which brings me to the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc), founded in 1982 by law students at Harvard, Yale and the University of Chicago. It claims to be a response to judicial activism and often quotes Alexander Hamilton to support their views.
It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the constitutional intentions of the legislature.
To achieve that goal, FedSoc wanted to flood the courts with their members. And flood them they have. All six Republican appointees to the Supreme Court belong to FedSoc. And surprise, surprise, so does Judge Aileen Cannon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, who, as I am writing this, just dismissed the classified documents case against Trump. Among the law professors in the FedSoc ranks is former dean of the Chapman University School of Law John Eastman, one of the architects of the 2020 fake electors scheme.
While the Heritage Foundation is the policy arm of the one-percent, the Federalist Society is the judicial branch of the same confederation. Donors include the Koch family ($116 billion net worth), the Richard Mellon Scaife family ($1.2 billion) foundation and the Mercer family ($900 million) as well as major corporations such as Google and Chevron. Yes, that Chevron. The losing plaintiff in a 1984 case which was recently overturned by a six member majority, you guessed it, the GOP appointees who just happen to be FedSoc members. [NOTE: The Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society are both 501(c)(3) educational foundations which means, assuming these major donors are in the maximum 37 percent marginal tax bracket, the federal government subsidizes 37 cent for each dollar they give to their “noble” cause.]
To suggest that FedSoc-appointed justices selectively suffer amnesia when its comes to Hamilton or their originalist philosophy is an understatement. The dam broke with Citizens United v. FEC. So much for legislative prerogative as Hamilton advocated. This case literally outlawed federal and state legislators’ role in regulating campaign financing. And, to this day, legal scholars are still looking for constitutional language that equates MONEY with SPEECH.
Likewise, by reversing the 1984 Chevron decision, the justices stripped Congress of its Article I authority to legislatively delegate rulemaking to federal agencies. To the contrary, the courts anointed the judiciary as the venue for oversight. In general, the Roberts court has repeatedly ruled in favor of management over workers, overturned state election laws and ignored the Article II of the Constitution in support of the the Heritage Foundation’s belief in the unitary theory of the executive branch. Can you say “presidential immunity?” I knew you could.
So forget Donald Trump! Republican presidents since 1980 have been doing the bidding of this cabal of oligarchs not unlike the one that pulls Vladimir Putin’s strings. Giving them massive tax breaks. Reducing regulations promulgated to protect the public health and safety. Appointing their hand-picked justices and judges who regularly decide cases in favor of the privileged. The difference with Trump is that they now have someone who revels in the trappings of the White House, unlike his patrons who prefer life under the radar. Equally important, even as he tosses out non-sensical ideas such as replacing the income tax with tariffs, he eventually lands exactly where they want him to be, deeper tax cuts and deregulation. It is this system, not Donald Trump, that should be on trial November 5th.
The solution?
- #1: Reposition the 2024 election as something other than a “grudge match” between Biden and Trump by nominating someone who can prosecute the oligarchs’ agenda rather than their mouthpiece.
- #2: Structure the Democratic convention to expose the consequences of an administration based on Project 2025. Do this with presentations by one member of Trump’s first administration who tells voters how implementation of Project 2025 proposals would corrupt the executive branch, followed by a Democrat who lays out an alternative agenda for the next four years. Each presentation should be illustrated with examples of the consequences for most Americans.
- #3: After pointing out Trump is only the messenger for the uber-rich elites, never mention his name again. Although Trump claims he is a changed man following his brush with death, does any actually believe him? Based on past behavior, I trust he will prove us correct without our help.
The prime directive? Explain why the 2024 election is a choice between Russian-style oligarchy and democracy. And separate voters’ perception that the MAGA agenda is a populist response to their grievances from what it really means for their families and wallets.
For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP