Category Archives: Random Thoughts

Random Thoughts 9/16/2017

 

In the continuing search for a happy medium between the demands of other projects–business, writing a novel and cleaning up after hurricanes–I have decided to move to a weekly post of random thoughts.

Today, I begin with two topics which were overshadowed by concern for the residents of SE Texas, the lower Atlantic coast and the Caribbean islands.  They are both related to the worn out mantra, “We need to run government like a business.”  It assumes businesses are all the same.  What if we ran government like a bait and switch scam?  Well, we are currently putting that to the test and how is that going?  Instead, what if we looked at specific business practices which might be adapted because they make the same sense in the public sector as they do for private enterprises.

Spousal Travel

I used to work for a major public interest group in Washington, D.C. which required almost weekly travel to meet with our clients.  I was allowed to take my wife on these trips under the following conditions.

  • I paid for her airfare.
  • Any expense which represented a cost above the travel reimbursement to which I was normally entitled came out of my own pocket.

For example, if there was no price differential between one or two people staying in the same hotel room, that was okay.  But if there was an additional charge for the second person in a cab or shuttle, that was my responsibility.  Of course, her meals and entertainment could not be charged back to the organization.

Now consider the recent efforts of Secretary of Creative Accounting Steven Mnuchin to bilk American taxpayers for his honeymoon and his optimal viewing of last month’s solar eclipse.  In both cases the use of a private government plane (at a cost of $25,000/hr) was dubious.  In the case of his European honeymoon there was no official business associated with this travel.  His excuse? As a member of the National Security Council (NSC) he needed to have encrypted access to the White House in case of an emergency.

But here’s the rub.  There are five categories of members/participants on the NSC in order of importance.

  1. Chairman (aka President)
  2. Statutory Attendees
  3. Military, Intelligence and Drug Policy Advisers
  4. Regular Attendees
  5. Additional Participants

Care to guess into which category the Treasury Secretary falls?  If you chose #5, give yourself a prize.

Image result for mnuchin and wife at ft. knoxAs for the trip to Ft. Knox, Kentucky, there was no scheduled event which required Mr. Mnuchin’s presence.  And he later claimed he had no interest at all in the solar eclipse. In an interview with Vanity Fair,  Mnuchin said, “You know, people in Kentucky took this stuff very serious.  Being a New Yorker and [living for a time in] California, I was like, the eclipse? Really? I don’t have any interest in watching the eclipse.”  So much for Republican claims it’s the Democrats who are coastal elites.

The solution.  Follow the same rules as my former DC employer.  Public officials (elected and administrative) should be required to reimburse the federal government for family members’ or friends’ airfare when using government transportation.  Use the standard already contained in Federal Elections Commission regulations.  If a candidate is offered space on a private or corporate plane, the campaign must reimburse the host individual or company the equivalent of an average first class airfare for a similar flight.  And unless the spouse is on official public business (one can imagine both Senator Mitch McConnell and his wife Transportation Secretary Elaine Choi having a role at an international event), all discretionary costs associated with companion travel should not be covered with government funds.

A Specific Business Approach Toward North Korea

I have a friend who for 20 plus years owned the third largest contractor in a business sector which is historically known for safety issues.  Workers compensation and liability insurance are major cost centers in this industry.  Most of the accidents are due to human error.  In other words, it was the employee’s fault.  Therefore, the traditional approach to work safety was to punish an employee if he/she violated safety regulations or procedures.  But as my friend soon learned that only ended up costing him more.  A disciplined employee was more likely to quit than change behavior, adding the expense of hiring and training new workers.

Instead, my friend chose a counter-intuitive approach and began offering bonuses to workers based on the number of days they went without a safety violation or incident.  Within months of implementing the policy, the number of safety incidents decreased significantly leading to reduced insurance premiums.  Employees now had a financial stake in the company’s safety program.

Image result for sam kinisonWhich brings us to North Korea.  For some reason, sticky issues always come back to Sam Kinison’s controversial declaration, “I don’t condone wife-beating, but I understand it.”  That’s exactly how I feel about North Korea.  I don’t condone nuclear proliferation, but in this case, I understand it.  Put yourself in Kim Jong-un’s shoes.  You watched the United States invade the sovereign nation of Iraq and overthrow its government.  What would keep the USA from doing the same thing in North Korea?  The obvious answer is nuclear deterrence.  History suggests it works.  Nuclear capability kept the cold war from heating up.  It maintains a relative state of peace between India and Pakistan.  And it remains Israel’s wild card as a weapon of last resort in the event of a second potential holocaust.

Following my friend’s entrepreneurial approach to workplace safety, one might say, “The stick doesn’t seem to be working; maybe we should offer a carrot.” Instead of backing Pyongyang into a corner, we should ask what could we do that gives Kim Jong-un a stake in defusing an escalation of more and more destructive weapons.  Didn’t John Kennedy do exactly that during the Cuban missile crisis in October, 1962?  Like Kim Jong-un, Fidel Castro was convinced the United State wanted regime change in Cuba.  A reasonable supposition following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. As part of the deal which resulted in the removal of Soviet offensive weapons from Cuba, Kennedy promised not to initiate or support any future attempts to overthrow Castro.

Instead of giving Kim Jong-un more reasons to expand his nuclear capabilities, maybe it’s time we give him a reason to start believing he doesn’t need them.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Great Non-White North

 

The title of today’s post is an obvious play on the SCTV sketch originated by a very young Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas in which they played the Mackenzie brothers, the ultimate stereotypes of clueless, beer guzzling Canadians.  Moranis is said to have disliked playing his character although he and Thomas appeared in 41 TV segments, two movies and commercials for Pizza Hut and Molson Beer.

Based on our experience the past two days in Winnipeg, either the parody was a gross misrepresentation of Canadian life or much has changed since Doug and Bob Mackenzie exited the airwaves.  Far from clueless, the Canadians seemed to have figured it out.  I could provide dozens of observations about the diversity which is visible throughout Winnipeg but I will focus on two specific examples.

Image result for canadian human rights museumThe first was a visit to the Canadian Human Rights Museum (CHRM) pictured here.  It stands in stark contrast to the American approach of individual halls dedicated to ethnic groups in Washington, D.C.  The seven levels of exhibits address the challenges and responses by the Canadian government and people to injustices based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender and sexual orientations.  The message is a clear and common theme.  EVERYONE DESERVES THE SAME HUMAN RIGHTS.  Equally important, the curators spared no effort in reminding visitors of past Canadian anti-human rights policies and attitudes that represent a stain on the country’s history.

One presentation was particularly striking.  It told the story of the Acadians from the time of the “Great Expulsion” of the Acadians in 1755-64 to their repatriation and the decision to make both English and French the official national languages.  One cannot help but see the parallels between the Acadians and Mexican-Americans.  An enlightened society would recognize that accepting Spanish speaking immigrants into American society is similarly repatriation of an ethnic group which lived in the Southwest prior to 1848.  Imagine if the United States followed a similar track, accepting Spanish as an official part of the American experience and culture.

There is also a hall which includes video testimonies from those who have been the beneficiaries of Canada’s current approach to human rights.  For me, the most touching was the story of Ali Duale, a Somali refugee who is now a member of the Halifax Fire Department and coaches a youth basketball team.  Too bad Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions have not seen this video.  Duale, when asked why he emigrated to Canada, replies, “It was not for a better life or money.  It was to survive.”

Image result for folkloramaThe second example is the reason we chose Winnipeg as a destination for this vacation.  The city is currently hosting Folklorama, a two week international festival with cultural pavilions representing more than 40 nations.  Last night we attended an event at the Cuban Pavilion for which all the performers were life-long Canadian residents who found outlets in Winnipeg and Edmonton to learn and perform their native music and dance.   The same was true of the “ambassadors” from several other national exhibits.  Whether Serbian or Polish, the answer to the question, “How long have you been in Canada,” the answer was always, “My whole life.”

In this morning’s Winnipeg newspaper, there was an article about the skyrocketing cost of housing in the area.  This should come as no surprise.  Want people to come visit and live in your community?  It’s simple.  Make them feel welcome.  And as the residents of the “Great Non-White North” have found, they can contribute much more than they take away.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Everything I Needed to Know I Learned from Judge Judy

 

DR_ESPYou may have noticed this is the first post in a new category called, “Random Thoughts.”  I had originally considered calling it, “Just Me,” but appreciate the fact America can only handle one raging narcissist at a time.  The purpose of this new grouping is to share some personal observations about creativity, how I use this blog to improve my own creative process and generic topics which do not necessarily fit into one or more of the topical categories.  Thank you in advance for this egocentric indulgence.

Also, thank you for all of your kind comments and support over the past 18 months.  This blog first appeared on-line on October 10, 2015.  At the time, one of my motivations was “learning by doing.”  If I wanted to now know more about blogs, why not start one.  I had originally planned to publish entries once or twice a month.  But as they say, “The best laid plans…”  Today’s entry is the 161st post.  Who knew?

Second, I have been receiving more and more suggestions about potential topics.  While these recommendations are very helpful in terms of understanding what is on your mind, I’m afraid it’s not how it works.  As I hope you realize, almost every post includes a phrase like, “I started to think about this when…”  In other words, I do not consciously pick the topics.  Something, usually a totally unrelated event or memory, becomes the kernel for a new post.  How do I know this?  Because, while I have now published 161 posts to this site, there are dozens in draft form which I have never completed.  When I go back to them from time to time, I immediately realize they were forced.  I had nothing unique or insightful to add to the conversation.  They were just my personal opinion.  As Kenny Rogers reminds us, “You need to know when to fold ’em.”

Consider the following example.  A lot of people have shared their opinion about the series of interviews Comrade Trump has given recently.  On his Monday night broadcast, Steve Colbert’s defense of his CBS colleague Face the Nation host John Dickerson was both brilliant and brutal.  That’s why I leave opining to the professionals. Remember, creativity is about great questions; get the question right and the answers will come.  The question I kept asking myself about the Trump interviews?  What did they miss?

Which brings us to Judge Judy, my one guilty pleasure. (In the interest of honesty, I probably have more than one.) Among her platitudes, my favorite is, “If it doesn’t make sense, it probably isn’t true.”  I know.  His Orangeness says a lot of things that do not make sense.  Most recently, Andrew Jackson could not understand why there had to be a Civil War?  Chalk that one up to ignorance.  And there is a YUGE difference between lying and mental incapacity.  This is where Judge Judy comes in.  By honing in on a minor detail, she is often able to unravel a plaintiff’s or defendant’s false testimony.

Much was made of Trump gaffe during his April 11 interview with Fox Business News host Maria Bartiromo during which he said the target of the April 6 Tomahawk Missile strike was “Iraq.”

TRUMP: So what happens is I said we’ve just launched 59 missiles heading to Iraq and I wanted you to know this. And he was eating his cake. And he was silent.

BARTIROMO:  (INAUDIBLE) to Syria?

TRUMP:  Yes. Heading toward Syria. In other words, we’ve just launched 59 missiles heading toward Syria.  And I want you to know that, because I didn’t want him to go home.  We were almost finished.  It was a full day in Palm Beach.  We’re almost finished and I — what does he do, finish his dessert and go home and then they say, you know, the guy you just had dinner with just attacked a country?

BARTIROMO:  How did he react?

TRUMP:  So he paused for 10 seconds and then he asked the interpreter to please say it again.  I didn’t think that was a good sign.

But the real “tell” was his assertion the generals told him they had just launched 59 missiles.  The night of the attack, it was reported there were 60 missiles launched of which 59 hit their intended targets.  First, it’s difficult to believe the generals would want their commander-in-chief to give such specific information to the Chinese president.  Second, before the damage assessment, why would the generals tell Trump there were 59 missiles launched?  This is what I call an “Occam’s Razor” moment.  The simplest explanation?  If Trump made up the detail about the number of missiles, everything else is suspect.  Except the dessert.

Judge Judy, thank you for helping me expose Trump as fabricator-in-chief.  In gratitude, I’ve just sent you the most beautiful piece of chocolate cake you’ve ever seen.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP