Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Dog Days of Summer

 

In baseball, the “dog days of summer” refers to the period from mid-July to the end of August when temperatures and humidity reach their peak.  It is also the time when a team’s outcome is pretty much determined.  You are either a contender or already declaring “wait ’til next year.”

For politicians running for election or re-election, baseball’s “dog days” represent an appropriate metaphor.  Playoff contenders traditionally use August as the time to assess the remaining schedule and look for proven talent (most often pitchers), fill gaps in the line-up and make sure the team is healthy and mentally prepared.  General managers, field managers and owners know you do not win the pennant in August, but what you do during that period may determine if you’re still in the race in October.

In contrast, the also-rans promote minor league players to determine their value in the future.  They also focus on window-dressing (e.g. special events and bringing in aging superstars) to fill seats once any hope of a championship season has vanished into the ether.

I thought about the “dog days of summer” when I saw the following headline in this morning’s New York Times, “Where Has Hillary Clinton Been? Ask the Ultrarich.”  The article included the following.

If Mr. Trump appears to be waging his campaign in rallies and network interviews, Mrs. Clinton’s second presidential bid seems to amount to a series of high-dollar fund-raisers with public appearances added to the schedule when they can be fit in. Last week, for example, she diverged just once from her packed fund-raising schedule to deliver a speech.

Conventional wisdom tells us voters don’t start looking at the election in earnest until Labor Day.  That being the case, one has to ask, “What is the best use of a candidate’s time and energy preparing for the political equivalent of a pennant race?”  Do exactly what a contending baseball organization would do!  Assess the schedule and begin the final push with a Labor Day event in New Hampshire, the state Nate Silver’s 538 forecast suggests may be the tipping point in the election.  Fill the gaps by reinserting Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren into the line-up.  Make sure you have the resources so money is not an issue.  Yes, Clinton mingled with the ultra-rich and raised a record $143 million in the month of August.  (NOTE: The Trump campaign has yet to release it’s August numbers.)  Be mentally prepared for the stretch run by prepping for the three presidential debates.

As your political playoff hopes dwindle, the question becomes, “How do I stay relevant?”  Bring in aging superstars such as Rudy Giuliani and Roger Ailes.  Promote minor leaguers like Steve Bannon, Mark Burns and Marco Gutierrez. Stage special events like a surprise trip to Mexico or a scripted interview at an African-American church in Detroit.

Politics is a business in which profits are measured in votes instead of dollars.  Therefore, candidates should heed the advice of business advisers like Ken DiPrima at Corporate Business Solutions.

The finish line is in sight. Whether a business is short of meeting their profit and sales goals or are exceeding them, how they emerge from the dog days of summer will determine whether they meet their target at the end of the year.

Also good advice for Amy Chozick and Jonathan Martin, the authors of the Times  article. The headline could have just as easily read, “Which Campaign Is Best Prepared for the Home Stretch?”  The reporters wouldn’t have to change a single word.  All they need is a better understanding of the ebb and flow of election cycles.  Perhaps re-reading Aesop’s “The Hare and the Tortoise,” might help.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Love the Crime; Hate the Criminal

 

In letter #211, St. Augustine wrote, “Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum,” which translates to, “With love for mankind and hatred of sins.”  The more commonly quoted version of this sentiment comes from Mahatma Gandhi, “Love the sinner but hate the sin.”  In Gandhi’s case, he appealed to his fellow countrymen to challenge British rule without fomenting hatred toward the English, hatred which  might lead to violence and undercut international support for the Indian independence movement.  The British wanted nothing more than the world to see Indians as violent and dangerous, unable to govern themselves.

My thoughts turned to St. Augustine and Gandhi yesterday when I saw Donald Trump’s response to the shooting death of Dwyane Wade’s cousin Nykea Aldridge.  Within hours the Republican nominee tweeted:

Dwyane Wade’s cousin was just shot and killed walking her baby in Chicago. Just what I have been saying. African-Americans will VOTE TRUMP!”

This is not the first time Trump has turned tragedy into a self-promoting vehicle.  It was one more in a series of initial reactions to tragic events in the United States and abroad.

After the murder of 49 members of the LBGT community at The Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida:

Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism, I don’t want congrats, I want toughness & vigilance. We must be smart!

And following a terrorist attack in Brussels, Belgium in which two Americans were among the 35 victims:

Remember when I recently said that Brussels is a “hell hole” and a mess and the failing @nytimes wrote a critical article. I was so right!

Thus, the title of this post.  Donald Trump sees crime and terrorist acts as a validation of his world view of America and the world as a dangerous and scary place.  He does not understand that Brussels was an ISIS target, NOT because it is a “hell hole,” but because it is a vibrant example of a free and open society.  Or that The Pulse was a symbol of tolerance.

Only after these tweets resulted in bi-partisan and public outrage, did Trump express sympathy for the victims and their families.  Trump is also quick to point out that criminals and terrorists are “really bad” people.  On that count he is right. However, instead of calling for justice for the victims, his initial exhortation is VOTE TRUMP!

Last night, Chicago police apprehended and charged two men accused of Nykea Aldridge’s murder.  Yet the master tweeter was silent as this development does not fit his narrative in which everything is “going to hell” and everybody is “not smart.”  I cannot help but wonder whether campaign strategists in Trump Tower believe more of these kinds of tragedy are just what their candidate needs to win in November.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

The Emily Litella Candidate

Sometimes, I really miss Gilda Radner and her many Saturday Night Live characters (e.g. Roseanne Rosannadanna, Lisa Loopner). Each was guaranteed to bring a smile to your face.  My favorite, however, was Emily Litella, the hard of hearing guest commentator on Weekend Update. Once informed she had misunderstood the question, she would close with her trademark line, “Never mind.”  This morning, I missed her more than ever.

I was reminded of the Emily Litella character when Donald Trump announced he had seen a “top secret” video of palettes of cash being unloaded from a plane in Iran as ransom for four U.S. hostages.  At a campaign rally in Florida, Trump said:

I’ll never forget the scene this morning. Iran — I don’t think you’ve heard this anywhere but here — Iran provided all of that footage, the tape of taking that money off that airplane, right? $400 million in cash.”

Now here’s the amazing thing. Over there, where that plane landed, top secret, they don’t have a lot of paparazzi. You know, the paparazzi doesn’t do so well over there, right? And they have a perfect tape done by obviously a government camera, and the tape is of the people taking the money off the plane, right? That means that in order to embarrass us further, Iran sent us the tapes, right? It’s a military tape. It’s a tape that was a perfect angle, nice and steady. Nobody getting nervous because they’re going to be shot because they’re shooting a picture of money pouring off a plane.

There’s a good reason we only heard it from Trump.  It was not true. Despite the fact, several news outlets and national security experts immediately responded no such video existed, Trump repeated the story Thursday afternoon at a rally in Portland, Maine.

Finally, after no evidence of the video surfaced and his own campaign staff admitted he was referring to a b-roll video of the detainees’ release in Geneva, Switzerland, Trump tweeted the following this morning.

The plane I saw on television was the hostage plane in Geneva, Switzerland, not the plane carrying $400 million in cash going to Iran!

Donald, you could have saved a lot of keystrokes if you’d only tweeted, “NEVER MIND!”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

A Solution in Search of a Problem

 

In an August 2nd interview with the Washington Post’s Phil Rucker, Donald Trump was asked about his statements that the 2016 presidential election might be rigged.

RUCKER: You said yesterday that you worried the election might be rigged in some way.

TRUMP: Yeah.

RUCKER: What is your worry exactly?

TRUMP: I don’t like what’s going on with voter ID.

RUCKER: It would be what’s happening in the states?

TRUMP: Well, I think it’s ridiculous.  I mean the voter ID situation has turned out to be a very unfair development.  We may have people vote 10 times.

One has to assume, Trump was referring to recent decisions by federal courts which have struck down voter ID laws in Texas (July 20), North Carolina (July 29),  Wisconsin (July 29), Kansas (July 29) and North Dakota (August 1).  However, contrary to Trump’s concern, there has not been a single case of multiple voting in states which do not require voter IDs or in the states involved in the court decisions prior to their passage of voter ID laws.

Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles has been tracking instances of voter fraud in the United States since 2000.  He uncovered 31 documented cases of voter fraud out of more than 1 billion ballots cast.  In Texas, the chance of voter fraud was one in 18 million (four cases out of 72 million votes).

How improbable is that?  According to the National Weather Service, the chance of being struck by lightning in Texas is only one in 1.35 million. National Geographic calculates the odds of being killed by a meteorite at one in 1.6 million.  About the only thing more unlikely than voter fraud is winning the Powerball lottery (odds of one in 292 million).  Perhaps that is why former Kansas Lieutenant Governor Gary Sherrer described state lotteries as a “tax on people who failed probability in school.”

As noted in a previous post, Mr. Trump, you are entitled to your opinion that the election is rigged, but you are not entitled to your own facts.  Unless the margin of victory in the popular vote or in any state is less than 31 votes (giving you the benefit of the doubt since that number covers 12 years), the outcome is due to something other than the lack of voter ID laws. Take another guess.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

The Real “Khan” Job

 

Dictionary.com defines the term “con” as a verb meaning (1) “to swindle; trick” or (2) “to persuade by deception, cajolery, etc.”

I looked up the term after businessman and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg addressed the Democratic National Convention last Wednesday night.  Playing off of Donald Trump’s defense of “New York values” following the derogatory use of that term by rival Senator Ted Cruz, Bloomberg said, “I am from New York and I know a con when I see one.” He elaborated using Trump’s history of bankruptcy and unmet obligations to address the first definition.  He followed with examples of the Republican’s campaign rhetoric and policies to suggest the second definition also applied to Trump’s efforts to gain voter support.

While the convention attendees cheered and applauded another billionaire’s rebuke of a peer, I had the feeling this was one more example of “he said, he said.”  And as expected, Trump used Bloomberg’s comments to remind his supporters that Hillary Clinton is the favorite of the rich and famous while he is “the voice” of the common American.  Furthermore, accusations that many Trump business deals ended in failure were not news.  They have been documented by the press continuously since Trump secured the Republican nomination.

Which brings us to Khizr and Ghazala Khan.  I have a friend and colleague from my days at Miami University who always urged his students to “be the adult in the room.”  To be honest, there have not been a lot of adults in the room during the current election cycle.  That changed last Thursday night.  Not only did the Khans remind us what makes America exceptional, they, I believe, unintentionally taught us how to deal with bluster and bullying.

References to Trump’s thin skin have been plentiful, including Clinton’s invoking this character flaw in her acceptance speech. “A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons.”  The Khans chose a different tack.  Instead of telling us how Trump responds to criticism, they created a situation in which he could either affirm or disprove charges of hypersensitivity.  They actually gave him a chance to be the adult in the room.  Not only did he fail, he garnered the lowest possible grade on this simple test of character.

Equally amazing, we soon discovered old billionaires can learn new tricks.   At a joint appearance in Omaha, Nebraska with Hillary Clinton on Monday, Warren Buffett drew on what he learned from the Khans.  He did not call Trump names for refusing to release his tax returns.  Like Khizr and Ghazala Khan, the “Oracle of Omaha” created a situation where Trump again has an opportunity to show he is an adult.  Buffett, whose tax returns are also under an IRS audit, said he was willing to make his public if Trump would do the same. Trump has ignored the challenge.

For a year, Donald Trump has warned us radical Islam will destroy us.  How ironic a patriotic Muslim and his wife may have just destroyed any hopes of Trump’s winning this election.  I look forward to the Oxford English Dictionary adding the term “Khan job” to the lexicography.  The definition?  A noun which describes the process of exposing con jobs.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP