MY v. THE

 

It only took two days.  Republicans are already making the moral equivalency argument they are just following Democratic precedent when they say, “Joe Biden is not MY president.  Isn’t that what all you 2016 deniers said about Donald Trump?”  They are half right.  I was proud to say Trump was not MY president.  Primarily because I was not responsible for his becoming the chief executive of the United States.  But more importantly, for more reasons  than I choose not to re-litigate here, I never want anyone, anywhere, anytime to explicitly or implicitly  think I would possibly associate with such an indecent, un-American individual regardless of their station in life.

But here is the difference these one-conspiracy-fits-all advocates miss.  I NEVER said, “Donald Trump is not THE president.”  You do not support impeachment and conviction of someone who is not THE president.  You do not wonder if Mike Pence has enough backbone to save the nation he swears he loves by invoking the 25th Amendment for anyone other than THE president.  You do not spend six months doing everything you can to deny someone a SECOND term unless they are THE president for four years.

I can only surmise Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, Kevin McCarthy and 146 other GOP members of Congress never watched the Sesame Street segment, “Which one of these is not like the others.”

  • Impeachment
  • 25th Amendment
  • Presidential Elections
  • Storming the United States Capitol

Ooh! Ooh!  I KNOW!  The first three are in the Constitution.  The fourth is only grounded in statute, in particular U.S. Code Title 18, Chapter 115, Section 2384 which makes it a crime when “two or more persons … conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States … or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof.”

During floor debate following the deadly attack on the “People’s House,” GOP speakers were quick to point out they were doing nothing more than their Democratic counterparts in 2000, 2004 and 2016.  True, if you believe telling your spouse he or she has not put on weight is the same as telling 365 million people an international pandemic will magically go away.  Or that 60+ judges, governors, election officials and state legislators of all partisan backgrounds are part of a six state cabal to steal an election.

In 2000 and 2004, objections involved one state each time, Florida and Ohio respectively.  In 2016 the issue was Russian interference in the election. In each case, the objections were raise by one or two lone voices, not a majority of the Democratic caucus. And in all three instances, the Democratic nominee conceded the election.  And none of the challengers invited supporters to come to Washington, D.C. and halt the constitutionally mandated process of counting state-certified slates of electors.

There is one more reason I never accepted Trump as MY president.  Recognition is a two-way street.  As I wrote on December 19, 2016, I acknowledged his constitutional right to sit at the Resolute Desk, but maintained my right not to support the substance of or his approach to governance when he suggested people like me were not real Americans.  At a “victory rally” in Mobile, Alabama two days earlier Trump told the crowd, those who rejected his candidacy were not patriots nor did they really love America.  Donald Trump had the same right to accurately claim I was not ONE of HIS people, but not that I no longer qualified as AN American as a result.

For the learning impaired let me put it this way.  When I look at a banana, I admit it is a fruit, just not MY kind of fruit.  I have to accept the fact it is a banana based on its physical characteristics and the process by which it became a banana.  But I am entitled to my own opinion whether to make one part of my diet.

I have no doubt one of the consequences cable news and on-line outlets will face in coming days is the dilemma when they do not have the benefit of breaking news from the White House multiple times a day.  News media of all stripes will be looking to fill airtime with insights about the state of the nation and citizen attitudes.  There will be occasions when correspondents will ask die-hard Trump voters how they feel about Joe Biden’s performance in office.  In many cases, the response may be, “He’s not MY president.”  How refreshing it would be if the reporter followed up, “I understand.  That’s your prerogative.  But do you recognize him as THE president.”  If the answer is, “No,” will that same reporter then ask, “Then do you believe in democracy and the Constitution?”

As the most trusted man in America Walter Cronkite used to say, “And that’s the way it is.  January 23, 2021.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

2 thoughts on “MY v. THE

  1. Just a reminder that I value & appreciate your messages every time, whether or not I
    Respond. This makes so much sense and, even though by nature I am an optimist, I have a difficult time expecting big changes in those who are bent on violating the Constitution. Thank you for your important voice!!

  2. Well said, as usual. A great example of the “great power” embedded in the smallest of words and a reminder to choose our words carefully.

    Nevertheless, I remain somewhat “bummed out” by the fact that the clarity and logic of your arguments will be lost on the very people who seem to have no recognition and/or use of either!

Comments are closed.