Americans stocking up on holiday cooking essentials may be greeted with an unwelcome surprise in the grocery aisles: higher prices for eggs, spurred by an intensifying bird flu outbreak.

~Danielle Kaye/New York Times

Kaye’s update on the “great American egg crisis” this morning should come as no surprise.  A February 2024 USDA report on the impact of bird flu listed it as the primary cause of the 229 percent increase in the cost of a dozen eggs.  At the same time, Donald Trump laid the blame on Bidenomics and promised voters they would see a return to pre-pandemic prices as soon as he took office.  Per his “Person of the Year” interview with Time Magazine, the president-elect has conceded lower grocery bills are less likely than pledged 10 months ago, and even more improbable based on his stated priorities for “Day One” and beyond.

This morning, John Fugelsang, host of “Tell Me Everything” on SiriusXM, predicted 2025 will be a comedian’s “gift from God.” The same is true for bloggers; so why wait for 2025.  Therefore, I proudly present Donald Trump’s “TOP TEN THINGS TO LOWER THE PRICE OF EGGS.”

#10:  Retake control of the Panama Canal to lower the cost of imports from EGGuador.

#9:  Change the name of Alaska’s Denali National Park back to McKinley National Park although Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski opposed the move saying, “We already went through this with President Trump at the very, very beginning of his first term.”  Though she could have added, “How many times will he try the same thing OVA and OVA again?”

#8:  Purchase Greenland from the Dutch believing the island could supply bird-flu resistant “green eggs” and “trichinosis-free ham.”

#7:  Sue the Des Moines Register for publishing an inaccurate poll in hopes the newspaper would stop predicting egg futures.

#6:  Nominate his daughter Tiffany’s “billionaire” father-in-law to the post of special Middle East envoy.  Turns out “master dealmaker” Massad Boulos is a salesman for a Nigerian truck and machinery company that reported $66,000 in profits in 2023.  He would have been better positioned if he worked for Cal-Maine Foods, the largest U.S. egg producer and and distributor, which reported FY2024 sales of (drum roll) $2.3 billion and net profit of $277.9 million.

#5:  Pressure Governor Ron DeSantis to appoint daughter-in-law Lara Trump to replace Senator Marco Rubio.  This, of course, negatively affected the egg supply when both the president-elect and daughter-in-law were seen at the Mar-a-Lago omelet bar with egg on their faces.

#4:  Deport millions of undocumented farm workers, especially those from Guatemala, who Trump accused of bringing bags of quetzals, the national bird, across the southern border.  More egg on his face when custom officials informed him “quetzal” is also the name of the Guatemalan currency.

#3:  Nominate alleged drug addict, statutory rapist and sex trafficker Matt Gaetz to be Attorney General.  His choice was based on Trump’s misunderstanding that reports of Gaetz transporting “young chicks” involved repopulating poultry farms with flu-free birds.

#2:  America First.  Beginning January 20, 2025, eggs produced and sold in the United States will be marketed under their scientific name  “gallus domesticus,” not to be confused with someone Matt Gaetz originally met and only dated in Florida.

#1:  Pardon the January 6 insurrectionists.  This is the one action that actually might address the price of eggs.  All those newly vacant prison cells can be used to isolate infected poultry.

Assuming none of the above makes a difference in the price of eggs, Trump will surely revert to his old tricks.  Blame Biden.  Blame the Fed.  Blame RFK, Jr.  Blame the Heritage Foundation.  Blame Obamacare.  Maybe even blame Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy for cutting USDA’s food safety programs.

And if that fails, he will step behind the podium in the press room and recommend farmers inject their hens with bleach or add ivermectin to their feed.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

But for the times in which we live, the following lede would have appeared in The Onion rather than the Arizona Republic.

The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a 160-year-old law that bans abortions and punishes doctors who provide them, saying the ban that existed before Arizona became a state can be enforced going forward.

Therefore, based on this new high bar for fictional satire, I have decided to propagate my own spin-off of The Onion.  I call it The Scallion, a smaller, less pungent satirical platform.  Below is a brief summary of the main story on the front page of the inaugural edition.

Arizona Supreme Court Bans More Privacy Rights.

On Friday, the Arizona Supreme Court upheld a 5,645-year-old law requiring men to sleep with their widowed sisters-in-law.  According to archivists at the Creation Museum in Boone County, Kentucky, God enacted the law to repopulate the human species which had been decimated by dinosaur attacks.  During oral arguments, Zavapai County Attorney Dennis McGrane, who successfully represented those in favor of the 1864 statute banning abortions, also represented plaintiffs who claimed that “spilling one’s seed” should be left up to the states.  The court ruled that without repeal of Genesis 38:8-10, the violation of oneself remained in effect including punishment specified in Verse 38:10.  “And the thing which he did displeased the Lord; therefore He slew him also.”

The justices rejected Onan’s two defense arguments. First, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes likened Onan’s refusal to impregnate his widowed sister-in-law to conscientious objection to war.  She reminded the justices Onan’s decision was based on his personal belief the practice of “levirate marriage,” in which the brother of a deceased man is obliged to marry his brother’s widow, was dishonest by pretending his seed was that of his brother, which it clearly was not.  Second, Onan felt that no one had the right to invade one’s privacy when it came to his sexual behavior.  Mayes added, “Just because Santa Claus knows when you are sleeping and knows when you’re awake, that does not give him the right to judge the actions of TWO NON-CONSENTING adults.”

Arizona Chief Justice Robert Brutinel, in a unanimous decision, left no room for ambiguity.  “In the 1864 statute case, we made it clear abortions are illegal in our state.  Based on the current case, even thinking about having sex and not completing the act as God intended, is not only illegal, it is a mortal sin punishable by death.”

In Tallahassee, Florida, State Supreme Court chief justice Carlos G. Muñiz bemoaned the fact he did not think of this first.  “I would hate to see Florida lose its reputation as the epicenter of radical legal nonsense.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

BLOGGER’S NOTE: Today marks the first entry in a new category “Comic Relief,” a subcategory of “Random Thoughts.” The reason for this addition is my sense of ennui associated with the current state of affairs in the United States and around the world. It feels we are in the middle of a five-act Shakespearean tragedy (though hopefully everyone will not die in Act V). I know many of you feel the same way and have remarked how this blog has helped you get through the last five years. So, rather than pile on, I thought it was time to add the equivalent of a modern-day Rosencrantz and Gildenstern, for just a moment, taking your mind off the drama and focusing on the less monumental absurdities of life.

The bigger discussion about the frustrations around casting is because many people don’t have a chair at the table. There must be a levelling, otherwise we are going to carry on having these debates.

~Eddie Redmayne re: “The Danish Girl”

The above quote appeared in Redmayne’s interview with the Sunday Times, during which he regrets having been cast as Lili Elbe in the Oscar nominated movie. His comments were in response to criticism by members of the transgender community including writer Carol Grant who felt Redmayne’s performance was “regressive, reductive and contributes to harmful stereotypes.”

My purpose today is not to determine whether director Tom Hooper erred when he selected Redmayne to play Lili. Instead, this current debate which is as old as lip-syncing Natalie Woods’ portrayal of Maria in “West Side Story” and Jonathan Pryce’s Tony Award- winning performance as Tran Van Dinh in the original Broadway cast of “Miss Saigon” raised questions about the choice of leading actors in other iconic roles.

Christopher Reeve proved not be a “Superman.” Did the fact Meryl Streep never left her real-life children to be with a female lover disqualify her from playing Joanna Kramer opposite Dustin Hoffman? But what about some of the other memorable performances in stage and filmdom history? Consider the following.

• Lon Chaney, Jr. as the hirsute monster in the werewolf franchise. If there is ever a low-budget remake, adult movie star Ron Jeremy (pictured below) was made for the part and could save the producers a fortune in makeup.

• Ann Baxter as Eve Harrington to Bette Davis’ Margo Channing in “All About Eve.” With the obvious difference that the older understudy is trying to replace a younger rival, Camilla Shand, Duchess of Cornwall, knows exactly what it feels like waiting in the wings for her chance at the lead role.

• Dustin Hoffman as Raymond Babbitt in “Rain Man.” However, casting a more appropriate Raymond is easy, as Hoffman’s character was inspired by the late “megasavant” Kim Peek (pictured below).

• How was Robin Wright in any way qualified to play the power behind the man as Claire Underwood in “House of Cards?” She never influenced any actual national policy decisions. The only person knowledgeable and experienced enough to understand what it means to pull the strings of the marionettes who surround the president is Ivanka Trump. Of course, she may be too busy competing with Nikki Haley as another option to replace Mike Pence in the forthcoming disaster movie “2024.”

• Russell Crowe as psychotic genius John Nash in “A Beautiful Mind.” Actually, this may be a case where director Ron Howard could be accused of type-casting. If only Crowe was a Noble Prize laureate in economics.

On a more serious note, I do worry that Hollywood’s concern about appropriated culture may go too far. But it is hard to argue the pendulum needed recalibrating after John Wayne as Genghis Khan in “The Conqueror (1956),” Mickey Rooney as Mr. Yunioshi in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961)” or even Sir Lawrence Olivier as “Othello (1965).”

If you think this form of type-miscasting peaked in the mid-20th century, think again. 2013 was a particularly awkward year when you consider Johnny Depp as Tonto in the remake of “The Lone Ranger” and Emma Stone as half-Asian Allison Ng in “Aloha.” But considering the critical and box office reception of these two flops, it was more likely a case of necessity as no Native American or Asian thespian with an ounce of professional integrity would have auditioned for these roles.

However, depriving an actor of an opportunity to step out of his/her own background or life experience is equally discomforting. Is it not equivalent to suggesting a young black child born in poverty cannot become a successful business person a la Oprah Winfrey or dismissing the next J. K. Rowling who overcame the challenges of being a single parent to become the highest paid author in the world? Would a modern day Gary Cooper be passed over as Lou Gehrig because he does not have ASL? For that matter, would the role of dead bodies on a battlefield be restricted to actual corpses?

Like most things in life, moderation is the order of the day. That does not mean filmmakers will, on occasion, push the envelope resulting in flaps similar to that raised by Redmayne’s portrayal of Lili Elbe. And there will just as likely be occasions when audiences do not get to enjoy an unexpected breakthrough performance. Dustin Hoffman as Ratso Rizzo comes to mind. Hopefully, through trial and error, a happy medium can be found.

Until then I look forward, based on this past weekend’s outing, to auditioning for the role of Charles Barkley in “Worst Golf Swings Ever,” assuming there is no African-American in his right mind willing to stoop to the level of self-depracation required to emulate the former NBA star’s style on the links.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP